On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:38:34PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:34:23AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:00:38PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:28:33PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 02, 201
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:34:23AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:00:38PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:28:33PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:15:22AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 01, 201
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:00:38PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:28:33PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:15:22AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 05:03:18PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 01, 201
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:10:38PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:51:02PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > qemu already almost supports PCI domains; that is, several entirely
> > independent PCI host bridges on the same machine. However, a bug in
> > pci_bus_new_inplac
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:00:38PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:28:33PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:15:22AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 05:03:18PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 01, 201
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:28:33PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:15:22AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 05:03:18PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:33:37PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 01, 201
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:15:22AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 05:03:18PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:33:37PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:10:38PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 01, 201
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 05:03:18PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:33:37PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:10:38PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:51:02PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > qemu already almost
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:33:37PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:10:38PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:51:02PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > qemu already almost supports PCI domains; that is, several entirely
> > > independent PCI host
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 05:31:06PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> [Added mst to Cc.]
>
> In order to use multi PCI domain, several areas need to be addressed
> in addition to this patch. For example, bios, acpi dsdt.
For x86, yes. For powerpc, which is what I'm working on, no.
> Do you have any
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:10:38PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:51:02PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > qemu already almost supports PCI domains; that is, several entirely
> > independent PCI host bridges on the same machine. However, a bug in
> > pci_bus_new_inplac
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:51:02PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> qemu already almost supports PCI domains; that is, several entirely
> independent PCI host bridges on the same machine. However, a bug in
> pci_bus_new_inplace() means that every host bridge gets assigned domain
> number zero and so c
[Added mst to Cc.]
In order to use multi PCI domain, several areas need to be addressed
in addition to this patch. For example, bios, acpi dsdt.
Do you have any plan for addressing those area?
What's your motivation for multi pci domain?
NOTE: I'm not opposing to this patch. Just curious for your
qemu already almost supports PCI domains; that is, several entirely
independent PCI host bridges on the same machine. However, a bug in
pci_bus_new_inplace() means that every host bridge gets assigned domain
number zero and so can't be properly distinguished. This patch fixes the
bug, giving each
14 matches
Mail list logo