On 08/02/2016 20:15, Peter Maydell wrote:
> That difference from the kernel script's behaviour is deliberate, because
> the attempt to list recent contributors tends to list a whole lot of
> irrelevant people. So if there's a documented maintainer we prefer to
> just list them, and not all the ra
On 8 February 2016 at 19:04, Stephen Warren wrote:
> qemu's get_maintainers.pl must be doing something different to the Linux
> kernel's version then, since IIRC the Linux kernel version always prints out
> recent contributors irrespective of whether maintainers were found, rather
> than as an alt
On 02/08/2016 11:52 AM, John Snow wrote:
On 02/08/2016 04:05 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Stephen Warren writes:
Add an entry to MAINTAINERS that matches every patch, and requests the
user send patches to qemu-devel@nongnu.org.
It's not 100% obvious to project newcomers that all patches sh
On 02/08/2016 04:05 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Stephen Warren writes:
>
>> Add an entry to MAINTAINERS that matches every patch, and requests the
>> user send patches to qemu-devel@nongnu.org.
>>
>> It's not 100% obvious to project newcomers that all patches should be sent
>> there; checkpa
Stephen Warren writes:
> Add an entry to MAINTAINERS that matches every patch, and requests the
> user send patches to qemu-devel@nongnu.org.
>
> It's not 100% obvious to project newcomers that all patches should be sent
> there; checkpatch doesn't say so, and since it mentions other lists to CC,
Add an entry to MAINTAINERS that matches every patch, and requests the
user send patches to qemu-devel@nongnu.org.
It's not 100% obvious to project newcomers that all patches should be sent
there; checkpatch doesn't say so, and since it mentions other lists to CC,
the wording "the list" from the S
