* Peter Crosthwaite (crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com) wrote:
Is there a functional reason for making this change, or pure
organisational? Either way the patch is ok, I'm just looking for the
motivation as this stuff did pop up in the multi-arch refactorings at
one stage and I did think about moving
Is there a functional reason for making this change, or pure
organisational? Either way the patch is ok, I'm just looking for the
motivation as this stuff did pop up in the multi-arch refactorings at
one stage and I did think about moving it. Can we add a one-liner to
commit message?
Regards,
On 14/08/2015 12:25, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert dgilb...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert dgilb...@redhat.com
---
include/exec/cpu-all.h | 41 -
include/exec/ram_addr.h | 40
From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert dgilb...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert dgilb...@redhat.com
---
include/exec/cpu-all.h | 41 -
include/exec/ram_addr.h | 40
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 41