On 01/23/2012 06:28 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 01/20/2012 08:43 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 20.01.2012 um 21:01 schrieb Scott Wood:
I'm not sure what happens when you write
an entry to TLB1 with an invalid TSIZE.
What it says, the ISA means it's implementation dependent. What e500mc actually
On 01/20/2012 08:43 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.01.2012 um 21:01 schrieb Scott Wood :
>> I'm not sure what happens when you write
>> an entry to TLB1 with an invalid TSIZE.
>
> What it says, the ISA means it's implementation dependent. What e500mc
> actually implements is an different
Am 20.01.2012 um 21:01 schrieb Scott Wood :
> On 01/20/2012 07:21 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> When setting a TLB entry, we need to check if the TLB we're putting it in
>> actually supports the given size. According to the 2.06 PowerPC ISA, a
>> value that's out of range results in the minimum p
On 01/20/2012 07:21 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> When setting a TLB entry, we need to check if the TLB we're putting it in
> actually supports the given size. According to the 2.06 PowerPC ISA, a
> value that's out of range results in the minimum page size for the TLB
> to be used.
The ISA says, "I
When setting a TLB entry, we need to check if the TLB we're putting it in
actually supports the given size. According to the 2.06 PowerPC ISA, a
value that's out of range results in the minimum page size for the TLB
to be used.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
---
v1 -> v2:
- fix min/max check