On 06.11.2013, at 04:02, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:16:33PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 05.11.2013 07:05, schrieb Alexander Graf:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 05.11.2013 um 05:00 schrieb Paul Mackerras :
>>>
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:05:58AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:16:33PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 05.11.2013 07:05, schrieb Alexander Graf:
> >
> >
> > Am 05.11.2013 um 05:00 schrieb Paul Mackerras :
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:05:58AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, we really need to check that guest
On 05.11.2013, at 17:16, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 05.11.2013 07:05, schrieb Alexander Graf:
>>
>>
>> Am 05.11.2013 um 05:00 schrieb Paul Mackerras :
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:05:58AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Yeah, we really need to check that guest vpcu == host vcpu f
Am 05.11.2013 07:05, schrieb Alexander Graf:
>
>
> Am 05.11.2013 um 05:00 schrieb Paul Mackerras :
>
>> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:05:58AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> Yeah, we really need to check that guest vpcu == host vcpu for HV KVM.
>>
>> In general I agree, but the one difficulty
Am 05.11.2013 um 05:00 schrieb Paul Mackerras :
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:05:58AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, we really need to check that guest vpcu == host vcpu for HV KVM.
>
> In general I agree, but the one difficulty I see is that a check for
> exact equality will interact
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:05:58AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> Yeah, we really need to check that guest vpcu == host vcpu for HV KVM.
In general I agree, but the one difficulty I see is that a check for
exact equality will interact badly with qemu's habit of picking a
specific processor vers
On 04.11.2013, at 10:24, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 11/04/2013 08:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 04.11.2013, at 09:58, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/04/2013 06:47 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 04.11.2013, at 04:36, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> If
On 11/04/2013 08:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 04.11.2013, at 09:58, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
>> On 11/04/2013 06:47 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04.11.2013, at 04:36, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>
If QEMU is started with KVM enabled and -cpu specified, and the CPU is
On 04.11.2013, at 09:58, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 11/04/2013 06:47 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 04.11.2013, at 04:36, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>
>>> If QEMU is started with KVM enabled and -cpu specified, and the CPU is not
>>> from the family which the host is running on, a
On 11/04/2013 06:47 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 04.11.2013, at 04:36, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
>> If QEMU is started with KVM enabled and -cpu specified, and the CPU is not
>> from the family which the host is running on, an error should be displayed
>> so this the patch does.
>>
>> Cc
On 04.11.2013, at 04:36, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> If QEMU is started with KVM enabled and -cpu specified, and the CPU is not
> from the family which the host is running on, an error should be displayed
> so this the patch does.
>
> Cc: Andreas Färber
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy
If QEMU is started with KVM enabled and -cpu specified, and the CPU is not
from the family which the host is running on, an error should be displayed
so this the patch does.
Cc: Andreas Färber
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy
---
Is that correct to assume that the closest abstract class is
12 matches
Mail list logo