RE: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] USB 2.0 EHCI emulation

2008-03-01 Thread Arnon Gilboa
t support ISO transfers > -timing issues > > > > -Original Message- > From: Gerb Stralko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:46 PM > To: Arnon Gilboa > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH]

Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] USB 2.0 EHCI emulation

2008-02-29 Thread Gerb Stralko
> > > > -Original Message- > From: Gerb Stralko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:46 PM > To: Arnon Gilboa > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] USB 2.0 EHCI emulation >

RE: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] USB 2.0 EHCI emulation

2008-02-28 Thread Arnon Gilboa
: Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:46 PM To: Arnon Gilboa Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] USB 2.0 EHCI emulation > Attached is a repost of the preliminary patch implementing USB 2.0 > EHCI emulation. I want to start testing your patch

Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] USB 2.0 EHCI emulation

2008-02-28 Thread Gerb Stralko
> Attached is a repost of the preliminary patch implementing USB 2.0 EHCI > emulation. I want to start testing your patches for the EHCI stuff. Do i need to enable anything inorder to get EHCI emulation working after applying your patch? Unfortunately, with this patch it doesn't work for me.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] USB 2.0 EHCI emulation

2008-01-08 Thread Avi Kivity
Paul Brook wrote: On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Dor Laor wrote: On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 01:30 +, Paul Brook wrote: -The host kernel was configured with dynamic tick & hi-res timers, to allow the desired timer resolution. USB 2.0 microframe is 125usec. It still works even witho

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] USB 2.0 EHCI emulation

2008-01-08 Thread Paul Brook
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Dor Laor wrote: > On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 01:30 +, Paul Brook wrote: > > > -The host kernel was configured with dynamic tick & hi-res timers, to > > > allow the desired timer resolution. USB 2.0 microframe is 125usec. > > It still works even without accurate timing dem

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] USB 2.0 EHCI emulation

2008-01-08 Thread Dor Laor
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 01:30 +, Paul Brook wrote: > > -The host kernel was configured with dynamic tick & hi-res timers, to > > allow the desired timer resolution. USB 2.0 microframe is 125usec. > It still works even without accurate timing demands. Only isochronous mode will have problems an

RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] USB 2.0 EHCI emulation

2008-01-08 Thread Arnon Gilboa
? Arnon -Original Message- From: Paul Brook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 3:30 AM To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Arnon Gilboa; KVM; Roni Luxenberg Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] USB 2.0 EHCI emulation > -The host kernel was configured with dynamic tick &

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] USB 2.0 EHCI emulation

2008-01-07 Thread Paul Brook
> -The host kernel was configured with dynamic tick & hi-res timers, to > allow the desired timer resolution. USB 2.0 microframe is 125usec. Requiring a 8kHz timer is a non-starter. The 100kHz "retry" timer is even more bogus. Qemu isn't capable of this kind of realtime response. You need to fi