On 11/08/2017 04:04 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> Well, they don't only need an explicitly set option, but the important
> point is that they don't work with the default value. But I can add
> something to this effect.
>
>>> +++ b/block/vvfat.c
>>> @@ -1259,7 +1259,11 @@ static int vvfat_open(BlockD
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 12:51:27PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 08.11.2017 um 11:49 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:44:01AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 07/11/2017 18:39, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 06:26:38PM +0100, Kevin Wo
Am 08.11.2017 um 13:00 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> On 08/11/2017 12:51, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 08.11.2017 um 11:49 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> >> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:44:01AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>> I am not sure this counts as deprecation, but it should go in the
>
On 08/11/2017 12:51, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 08.11.2017 um 11:49 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
>> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:44:01AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> I am not sure this counts as deprecation, but it should go in the
>>> release notes as "future incompatible changes", and that se
Am 08.11.2017 um 11:49 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:44:01AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 07/11/2017 18:39, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 06:26:38PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > >> bdrv_set_read_only() is used by some block drivers
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:44:01AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 07/11/2017 18:39, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 06:26:38PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> bdrv_set_read_only() is used by some block drivers to override the
> >> read-only option given by the user. This is no
On 07/11/2017 18:39, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 06:26:38PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> bdrv_set_read_only() is used by some block drivers to override the
>> read-only option given by the user. This is not how read-only images
>> generally work in QEMU: Instead of second gue
Am 07.11.2017 um 21:29 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 11/07/2017 11:26 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > bdrv_set_read_only() is used by some block drivers to override the
> > read-only option given by the user. This is not how read-only images
> > generally work in QEMU: Instead of second guessing what
On 11/07/2017 11:26 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> bdrv_set_read_only() is used by some block drivers to override the
> read-only option given by the user. This is not how read-only images
> generally work in QEMU: Instead of second guessing what the user really
> meant (which currently includes making an
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 06:26:38PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> bdrv_set_read_only() is used by some block drivers to override the
> read-only option given by the user. This is not how read-only images
> generally work in QEMU: Instead of second guessing what the user really
> meant (which currently
bdrv_set_read_only() is used by some block drivers to override the
read-only option given by the user. This is not how read-only images
generally work in QEMU: Instead of second guessing what the user really
meant (which currently includes making an image read-only even if the
user didn't only use
11 matches
Mail list logo