Am 10.01.2014 um 20:03 hat Peter Feiner geschrieben:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 10.01.2014 um 19:05 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> >> On 10.01.2014 18:55, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> >Ok, if you're happy with it, I'll apply it. Can I put your Reviewed-by
> >> >there?
> >>
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 10.01.2014 um 19:05 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> On 10.01.2014 18:55, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> >Ok, if you're happy with it, I'll apply it. Can I put your Reviewed-by
>> >there?
>>
>> Yes, feel free to.
>
> Thanks, applied to the block branch.
>
Am 10.01.2014 um 19:38 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 10.01.2014 19:26, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >Am 10.01.2014 um 19:05 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> >>On 10.01.2014 18:55, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>>Ok, if you're happy with it, I'll apply it. Can I put your Reviewed-by
> >>>there?
> >>Yes, feel free to.
>
Am 10.01.2014 um 19:05 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 10.01.2014 18:55, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >Ok, if you're happy with it, I'll apply it. Can I put your Reviewed-by
> >there?
>
> Yes, feel free to.
Thanks, applied to the block branch.
Peter, no need for a second version of the patch then. :-)
>
On 10.01.2014 19:26, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 10.01.2014 um 19:05 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
On 10.01.2014 18:55, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Ok, if you're happy with it, I'll apply it. Can I put your Reviewed-by
there?
Yes, feel free to.
Thanks, applied to the block branch.
Peter, no need for a second ve
On 10.01.2014 18:55, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 10.01.2014 um 18:27 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
On 09.01.2014 11:59, Kevin Wolf wrote:
[ CCing Max, who was recently active in this area, for another opinion ]
Am 08.01.2014 um 20:43 hat Peter Feiner geschrieben:
When a backing file is opened such that
Am 10.01.2014 um 18:27 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 09.01.2014 11:59, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >[ CCing Max, who was recently active in this area, for another opinion ]
> >
> >Am 08.01.2014 um 20:43 hat Peter Feiner geschrieben:
> >>When a backing file is opened such that (1) a protocol is directly
>
On 09.01.2014 11:59, Kevin Wolf wrote:
[ CCing Max, who was recently active in this area, for another opinion ]
Am 08.01.2014 um 20:43 hat Peter Feiner geschrieben:
When a backing file is opened such that (1) a protocol is directly
used as the block driver and (2) the block driver has bdrv_file
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> I think if there is no bs->backing_hd->file, we should get the filename
> from bs->backing_hd->filename instead of leaving it empty.
>
> In fact, can we always do that or does bs->backing_hd normally lack the
> filename? If so, perhaps that is wh
[ CCing Max, who was recently active in this area, for another opinion ]
Am 08.01.2014 um 20:43 hat Peter Feiner geschrieben:
> When a backing file is opened such that (1) a protocol is directly
> used as the block driver and (2) the block driver has bdrv_file_open,
> bdrv_open_backing_file segfau
Hi Peter,
Thank your for catching this.
On 2014年01月09日 03:43, Peter Feiner wrote:
When a backing file is opened such that (1) a protocol is directly
used as the block driver and (2) the block driver has bdrv_file_open,
bdrv_open_backing_file segfaults. The problem arises because
bdrv_open_comm
When a backing file is opened such that (1) a protocol is directly
used as the block driver and (2) the block driver has bdrv_file_open,
bdrv_open_backing_file segfaults. The problem arises because
bdrv_open_common returns without setting bd->backing_hd->file.
To effect (1), you seem to have to us
12 matches
Mail list logo