On 9 February 2016 at 18:49, Eric Blake wrote:
> Actively redefining 'inline' is wrong for C++, where gcc has an
> extension 'inline namespace' which fails to compile if the
> keyword 'inline' is replaced by a macro expansion. This will
> matter once we start to include "qemu/osdep.h" first from
On 02/12/2016 06:24 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 February 2016 at 18:49, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Actively redefining 'inline' is wrong for C++, where gcc has an
>> extension 'inline namespace' which fails to compile if the
>> keyword 'inline' is replaced by a macro expansion. This will
>> matter
On 9 February 2016 at 18:49, Eric Blake wrote:
> Actively redefining 'inline' is wrong for C++, where gcc has an
> extension 'inline namespace' which fails to compile if the
> keyword 'inline' is replaced by a macro expansion. This will
> matter once we start to include "qemu/osdep.h" first from
Actively redefining 'inline' is wrong for C++, where gcc has an
extension 'inline namespace' which fails to compile if the
keyword 'inline' is replaced by a macro expansion. This will
matter once we start to include "qemu/osdep.h" first from C++
files, depending also on whether the system headers
