We don't need qemu-keymap when we build only linux-user qemu.
When we compile in static mode, the libxkbcommon is detected
by configure if the shared one is available, but cannot
be linked if the static version is not available.
As we don't need it for qemu-linux-user, and we generally need
a
On 10/13/2017 12:14 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 13 October 2017 at 12:46, Thomas Huth wrote:
I disagree. If the next OpenBSD release uses Clang by default, we're not
building QEMU there with the *working default* C compiler anymore.
You're then rather forcing the OpenBSD
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 09:44:42AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > By the way, looks like OpenBSD is also switching to clang by default
> > soon:
> >
> > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=OpenBSD-Default-
> > Clang
>
> It did happen already. On openbsd 6.2 (released a
Hi,
> By the way, looks like OpenBSD is also switching to clang by default
> soon:
>
> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=OpenBSD-Default-
> Clang
It did happen already. On openbsd 6.2 (released a week ago) cc is
clang:
$ cc --version
OpenBSD clang version 4.0.0
On 13 October 2017 at 12:46, Thomas Huth wrote:
> I disagree. If the next OpenBSD release uses Clang by default, we're not
> building QEMU there with the *working default* C compiler anymore.
> You're then rather forcing the OpenBSD users then to install an
> additional (likely
On 13.10.2017 13:38, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:55:40PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 13.10.2017 12:52, Thomas Huth wrote:
[...]
>> By the way, looks like OpenBSD is also switching to clang by default soon:
>>
>>
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:55:40PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 13.10.2017 12:52, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 13.10.2017 12:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> The system compiler in OpenBSD is gcc 4.2.1 which is too
> >> old for our needs. If doing 'pkg_add gcc' you can get a
> >> much newer
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:52:26PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 13.10.2017 12:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > The system compiler in OpenBSD is gcc 4.2.1 which is too
> > old for our needs. If doing 'pkg_add gcc' you can get a
> > much newer version (4.9.4 in OpenBSD 6.1) which works with
> >
On 13.10.2017 12:52, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 13.10.2017 12:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> The system compiler in OpenBSD is gcc 4.2.1 which is too
>> old for our needs. If doing 'pkg_add gcc' you can get a
>> much newer version (4.9.4 in OpenBSD 6.1) which works with
>> QEMU. This installs
On 13.10.2017 12:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The system compiler in OpenBSD is gcc 4.2.1 which is too
> old for our needs. If doing 'pkg_add gcc' you can get a
> much newer version (4.9.4 in OpenBSD 6.1) which works with
> QEMU. This installs binaries with two naming schemes:
>
> $ pkg_info
The system compiler in OpenBSD is gcc 4.2.1 which is too
old for our needs. If doing 'pkg_add gcc' you can get a
much newer version (4.9.4 in OpenBSD 6.1) which works with
QEMU. This installs binaries with two naming schemes:
$ pkg_info -L gcc | grep bin
/usr/local/bin/ecpp
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:36:03 +0200
Thomas Huth wrote:
> libseccomp supports s390x since version 2.3.0, and I was able to start
> a VM with "-sandbox on" without any obvious problems by using this patch,
> so it should be safe to allow --enable-seccomp on s390x nowadays, too.
>
On 09/14/2017 12:36 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> libseccomp supports s390x since version 2.3.0, and I was able to start
> a VM with "-sandbox on" without any obvious problems by using this patch,
> so it should be safe to allow --enable-seccomp on s390x nowadays, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 01:55:46PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 09/14/2017 12:36 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > libseccomp supports s390x since version 2.3.0, and I was able to start
> > a VM with "-sandbox on" without any obvious problems by using this patch,
> > so it should be safe to
On 09/14/2017 12:36 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> libseccomp supports s390x since version 2.3.0, and I was able to start
> a VM with "-sandbox on" without any obvious problems by using this patch,
> so it should be safe to allow --enable-seccomp on s390x nowadays, too.
Seems to work fine on s390x.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:36:03PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> libseccomp supports s390x since version 2.3.0, and I was able to start
> a VM with "-sandbox on" without any obvious problems by using this patch,
> so it should be safe to allow --enable-seccomp on s390x nowadays, too.
>
I don't
libseccomp supports s390x since version 2.3.0, and I was able to start
a VM with "-sandbox on" without any obvious problems by using this patch,
so it should be safe to allow --enable-seccomp on s390x nowadays, too.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
---
configure | 2 +-
1 file
On 4 September 2017 at 18:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Nobody has mentioned AIX host support on the mailing list for years,
> and we have no test systems for it so it is most likely broken.
> We've advertised in configure for two releases now that we plan
> to drop support
On 5 September 2017 at 08:36, Thomas Huth wrote:
> OTOH, AIX support is really very, very like broken since years
It turns out there's an AIX box in the gcc compile farm, so just
out of curiosity I had a look.
(1) we don't recognize the cpu so you have to pass --cpu=ppc64
(2)
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 06:19:00PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Nobody has mentioned AIX host support on the mailing list for years,
> and we have no test systems for it so it is most likely broken.
> We've advertised in configure for two releases now that we plan
> to drop support for this host
On 05.09.2017 10:04, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 08:09:17PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 04.09.2017 19:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Nobody has mentioned AIX host support on the mailing list for years,
>>> and we have no test systems for it so it is most likely broken.
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 08:09:17PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 04.09.2017 19:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > Nobody has mentioned AIX host support on the mailing list for years,
> > and we have no test systems for it so it is most likely broken.
> > We've advertised in configure for two releases
On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 18:19:00 +0100
Peter Maydell wrote:
> Nobody has mentioned AIX host support on the mailing list for years,
> and we have no test systems for it so it is most likely broken.
> We've advertised in configure for two releases now that we plan
> to drop
On 05.09.2017 09:16, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> On 4 September 2017 at 19:09, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 04.09.2017 19:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
Nobody has mentioned AIX host support on the mailing list for years,
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 4 September 2017 at 19:09, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 04.09.2017 19:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Nobody has mentioned AIX host support on the mailing list for years,
>>> and we have no test systems for it so it is most likely
On 04.09.2017 19:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Nobody has mentioned AIX host support on the mailing list for years,
> and we have no test systems for it so it is most likely broken.
> We've advertised in configure for two releases now that we plan
> to drop support for this host OS, and have had no
Le 04/09/2017 à 19:19, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> Nobody has mentioned AIX host support on the mailing list for years,
> and we have no test systems for it so it is most likely broken.
> We've advertised in configure for two releases now that we plan
> to drop support for this host OS, and have had
On 4 September 2017 at 19:09, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 04.09.2017 19:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Nobody has mentioned AIX host support on the mailing list for years,
>> and we have no test systems for it so it is most likely broken.
>> We've advertised in configure for two
On 04.09.2017 19:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Nobody has mentioned AIX host support on the mailing list for years,
> and we have no test systems for it so it is most likely broken.
> We've advertised in configure for two releases now that we plan
> to drop support for this host OS, and have had no
On 09/04/2017 02:19 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
Nobody has mentioned AIX host support on the mailing list for years,
and we have no test systems for it so it is most likely broken.
We've advertised in configure for two releases now that we plan
to drop support for this host OS, and have had no
Nobody has mentioned AIX host support on the mailing list for years,
and we have no test systems for it so it is most likely broken.
We've advertised in configure for two releases now that we plan
to drop support for this host OS, and have had no complaints.
Drop the AIX host support code.
We can
On 07/25/2017 10:28 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> - rm -f $(filter-out %.tlb,$(TOOLS)) $(HELPERS-y) qemu-ga TAGS
>>> cscope.* *.pod *~ */*~
>>> + rm -f $(filter-out %.tlb,$(TOOLS)) $(HELPERS-y) qemu-ga${EXESUF}
>>> TAGS cscope.* *.pod *~ */*~
>>>
>>> It's a bit ugly since `rm -f
As noticed by Michael Roth the ./configure entry for qemu-ga is missing
the $(EXESUF) on purpose (see fafcaf1d).
Patch dropped for 2.10
On 07/24/2017 10:15 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Reported-by: Sameeh Jubran
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 07/25/2017 11:56 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
Quoting Michael Roth (2017-07-25 21:53:41)
Quoting Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2017-07-25 20:45:31)
[...]
That change was done explicitly via fafcaf1d so that `make qemu-ga` and
`make` without --disable-tools specified to configure will generate the
MSI
Quoting Michael Roth (2017-07-25 21:56:14)
> Quoting Michael Roth (2017-07-25 21:53:41)
> > Quoting Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2017-07-25 20:45:31)
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > > On 07/25/2017 08:03 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
> > > > Quoting Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2017-07-24 20:15:30)
> > > >>
Quoting Michael Roth (2017-07-25 21:53:41)
> Quoting Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2017-07-25 20:45:31)
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > On 07/25/2017 08:03 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
> > > Quoting Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2017-07-24 20:15:30)
> > >> Reported-by: Sameeh Jubran
> > >>
Quoting Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2017-07-25 20:45:31)
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 07/25/2017 08:03 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
> > Quoting Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2017-07-24 20:15:30)
> >> Reported-by: Sameeh Jubran
> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> >> ---
>
Hi Michael,
On 07/25/2017 08:03 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
Quoting Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2017-07-24 20:15:30)
Reported-by: Sameeh Jubran
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
---
original report from Sameeh Jubran:
Quoting Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2017-07-24 20:15:30)
> Reported-by: Sameeh Jubran
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> ---
> original report from Sameeh Jubran:
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-07/msg00906.html
AFAICT the issue
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 10:15:30PM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Reported-by: Sameeh Jubran
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> ---
> original report from Sameeh Jubran:
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-07/msg00906.html
>
Reported-by: Sameeh Jubran
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
---
original report from Sameeh Jubran:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-07/msg00906.html
Makefile | 2 +-
configure | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
On 13 July 2017 at 16:15, Peter Maydell wrote:
> For a very long time we have used 'uname -s' as our fallback if
> we don't identify the target OS using a compiler #define. This
> obviously doesn't work for cross-compilation, and we've had
> a comment suggesting we fix
On 13 July 2017 at 15:21, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Solaris 9 was released in 2002, its successor Solaris 10 was
> released in 2005, and Solaris 9 was end-of-lifed in 2014.
> Nobody has stepped forward to express interest in supporting
> Solaris of any flavour, so removing
On 07/20/2017 05:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 04:57:29PM +0200, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Compilation breaks on GCC 7.1.1 20170622 (Fedora 26), thus adding
-Wno-format-truncation to QEMU_CFLAGS on configure script is neecssary.
hw/usb/bus.c: In function
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 04:57:29PM +0200, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> Compilation breaks on GCC 7.1.1 20170622 (Fedora 26), thus adding
> -Wno-format-truncation to QEMU_CFLAGS on configure script is neecssary.
>
> hw/usb/bus.c: In function ‘usb_port_location’:
> hw/usb/bus.c:410:66: error:
Hi,
This series failed build test on FreeBSD host. Please find the details below.
Type: series
Message-id: 20170720145729.22141-1-ot...@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: add -Wno-format-truncation to
QEMU_CFLAGS
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/sh
# Testing script
Compilation breaks on GCC 7.1.1 20170622 (Fedora 26), thus adding
-Wno-format-truncation to QEMU_CFLAGS on configure script is neecssary.
hw/usb/bus.c: In function ‘usb_port_location’:
hw/usb/bus.c:410:66: error: ‘%d’ directive output may be truncated writing
between 1 and 11 bytes into
For a very long time we have used 'uname -s' as our fallback if
we don't identify the target OS using a compiler #define. This
obviously doesn't work for cross-compilation, and we've had
a comment suggesting we fix this in configure for a long time.
Since we now have an exhaustive list of which
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 03:21:37PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Solaris 9 was released in 2002, its successor Solaris 10 was
> released in 2005, and Solaris 9 was end-of-lifed in 2014.
> Nobody has stepped forward to express interest in supporting
> Solaris of any flavour, so removing support for
On 07/13/2017 09:21 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Solaris 9 was released in 2002, its successor Solaris 10 was
> released in 2005, and Solaris 9 was end-of-lifed in 2014.
> Nobody has stepped forward to express interest in supporting
> Solaris of any flavour, so removing support for the ancient
>
Solaris 9 was released in 2002, its successor Solaris 10 was
released in 2005, and Solaris 9 was end-of-lifed in 2014.
Nobody has stepped forward to express interest in supporting
Solaris of any flavour, so removing support for the ancient
versions seems uncontroversial.
In particular, this
Applied to trivial, thanks!
/mjt
13.06.2017 21:00, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The configure script prefers pkg-config over sdl-config, but
> the "--static-libs" parameter only exists for the latter. With
> pkg-config, "--static --libs" have to be used instead.
Applied to -trivial, thanks!
/mjt
On 06/26/2017 12:25 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
Our FORTIFY_SOURCE check assumes that $cxx refers to a working C++
compiler, with the result that if you don't happen to have one
then configure will spuriously print
configure: line 4685: c++: command not found
Fix this by adding a 'has $cxx'
Our FORTIFY_SOURCE check assumes that $cxx refers to a working C++
compiler, with the result that if you don't happen to have one
then configure will spuriously print
configure: line 4685: c++: command not found
Fix this by adding a 'has $cxx' check.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
On 2 June 2017 at 15:35, Peter Maydell wrote:
> We want the wide character functions from the ncurses header.
> Unfortunately it doesn't provide them by default, but only
> if either:
> * NCURSES_WIDECHAR is defined (for ncurses 20111030 and up)
> *
Hi,
This series failed automatic build test. Please find the testing commands and
their output below. If you have docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
Type: series
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: Fix build with pkg-config and --static
--enable-sdl
Message-id
The configure script prefers pkg-config over sdl-config, but
the "--static-libs" parameter only exists for the latter. With
pkg-config, "--static --libs" have to be used instead.
Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/984516
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
---
configure | 6
On 06/03/17 11:43, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 02.06.2017 23:58, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 06/02/17 16:35, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> We want the wide character functions from the ncurses header.
>>> Unfortunately it doesn't provide them by default, but only
>>> if either:
>>> * NCURSES_WIDECHAR
On 03.06.2017 12:13, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2017-06-02 16:35, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> diff --git a/configure b/configure
>> index 0586ec9..6aca5d1 100755
>> --- a/configure
>> +++ b/configure
>> @@ -3053,6 +3053,8 @@ int main(void) {
>> EOF
>>IFS=:
>>for curses_inc in $curses_inc_list;
On 2017-06-02 16:35, Peter Maydell wrote:
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index 0586ec9..6aca5d1 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -3053,6 +3053,8 @@ int main(void) {
> EOF
>IFS=:
>for curses_inc in $curses_inc_list; do
> +# Make sure we get the wide character
On 02.06.2017 23:58, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 06/02/17 16:35, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> We want the wide character functions from the ncurses header.
>> Unfortunately it doesn't provide them by default, but only
>> if either:
>> * NCURSES_WIDECHAR is defined (for ncurses 20111030 and up)
>> *
On 06/02/17 16:35, Peter Maydell wrote:
> We want the wide character functions from the ncurses header.
> Unfortunately it doesn't provide them by default, but only
> if either:
> * NCURSES_WIDECHAR is defined (for ncurses 20111030 and up)
> * _XOPEN_SOURCE/_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED are suitably
We want the wide character functions from the ncurses header.
Unfortunately it doesn't provide them by default, but only
if either:
* NCURSES_WIDECHAR is defined (for ncurses 20111030 and up)
* _XOPEN_SOURCE/_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED are suitably defined
So far we have been implicitly relying on
26.04.2017 13:50, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> NetBSD ships with traditional BSD curses with compatibility with ncurses.
> qemu works nicely with the basesystem version of curses(3) from NetBSD.
>
> The only mismatch between curses(3) and ncurses is the lack of
> curses_version() in the NetBSD
Hi Kamil,
On 04/26/2017 07:50 AM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
NetBSD ships with traditional BSD curses with compatibility with ncurses.
qemu works nicely with the basesystem version of curses(3) from NetBSD.
The only mismatch between curses(3) and ncurses is the lack of
curses_version() in the
Ping? Could someone please put it on the pull-request?
Adding qemu-trivial@.
On 08.05.2017 13:33, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Kamil Rytarowski writes:
>
>> NetBSD ships with traditional BSD curses with compatibility with ncurses.
>> qemu works nicely with the basesystem version of
On Thu, 11 May 2017, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> QEMU does not depends on libxencall, it was added because it was a
> missing link dependency of libxendevicemodel, but now the later should
> be built properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
Reviewed-by: Stefano
QEMU does not depends on libxencall, it was added because it was a
missing link dependency of libxendevicemodel, but now the later should
be built properly.
Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
---
configure | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Kamil Rytarowski writes:
> NetBSD ships with traditional BSD curses with compatibility with ncurses.
> qemu works nicely with the basesystem version of curses(3) from NetBSD.
>
> The only mismatch between curses(3) and ncurses is the lack of
> curses_version() in the NetBSD
x1 ping
On 26.04.2017 12:50, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> NetBSD ships with traditional BSD curses with compatibility with ncurses.
> qemu works nicely with the basesystem version of curses(3) from NetBSD.
>
> The only mismatch between curses(3) and ncurses is the lack of
> curses_version() in the
On 26 April 2017 at 14:21, Greg Kurz wrote:
> Since commit "c53eeaf75a04 configure: eliminate Python dependency for
> --help", configure --help fails to produce the list of available trace
> backends if invoked out-of-tree. It also spits the following error:
>
> grep:
Since commit "c53eeaf75a04 configure: eliminate Python dependency for
--help", configure --help fails to produce the list of available trace
backends if invoked out-of-tree. It also spits the following error:
grep: scripts/tracetool/backend/*.py: No such file or directory
This patch simply adds
NetBSD ships with traditional BSD curses with compatibility with ncurses.
qemu works nicely with the basesystem version of curses(3) from NetBSD.
The only mismatch between curses(3) and ncurses is the lack of
curses_version() in the NetBSD version. This function is used solely in
the configure
On 28 March 2017 at 14:08, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> The ./configure script should produce --help output even if Python is
> not installed.
>
> Listing trace backends is simple: show the names of all Python modules
> in scripts/tracetool/backend/ whose source code contains
The ./configure script should produce --help output even if Python is
not installed.
Listing trace backends is simple: show the names of all Python modules
in scripts/tracetool/backend/ whose source code contains 'PUBLIC =
True'.
Perform the backend enumeration in shell instead of Python so that
On 23 March 2017 at 08:58, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:08:49PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Fix some cut-and-paste errors in the OS deprecation warning
>> pointed out by Thomas Huth.
>>
>> Reported-by: Thomas Huth
>> Signed-off-by:
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:08:49PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Fix some cut-and-paste errors in the OS deprecation warning
> pointed out by Thomas Huth.
>
> Reported-by: Thomas Huth
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
> ---
> configure | 4 ++--
> 1
Fix some cut-and-paste errors in the OS deprecation warning
pointed out by Thomas Huth.
Reported-by: Thomas Huth
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
---
configure | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
On 03/17/2017 09:52 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 17 March 2017 at 11:49, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:08:22AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
We plan to drop support in a future QEMU release for host OSes
and host architectures for which we have no test
On 17 March 2017 at 11:08, Peter Maydell wrote:
> This commit flags up as deprecated the CPU architectures:
> * ia64
> * sparc
> * anything which we don't have a TCG port for
>(and which was presumably using TCI)
> and the OSes:
> * Cygwin
> * GNU/kFreeBSD
> *
On 17.03.2017 14:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 March 2017 at 13:19, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 17.03.2017 12:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 17 March 2017 at 11:49, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:08:22AM +, Peter Maydell
On 17 March 2017 at 13:19, Thomas Huth wrote:
> So could you maybe change your patch that it does not warn when the user
> has run configure with the "--enable-tcg-interpreter" option?
Nope. I specifically don't want to enable support for TCI on random
who-knows-what-this-is
On 17 March 2017 at 13:19, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 17.03.2017 12:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 17 March 2017 at 11:49, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:08:22AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
We plan to drop support in a future
On 17.03.2017 12:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 March 2017 at 11:49, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:08:22AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> We plan to drop support in a future QEMU release for host OSes
>>> and host architectures for which we have
On Fri, 2017-03-17 at 11:56 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Yeah. I'm just struggling with setting up a FreeBSD VM so we
> > can compile test that. Interesting that GNU/kFreeBSD has users.
>
> I wouldn't go so far as to say GNU/kFreeBSD has users. It had a few people
> who have noticed bits
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:49:53AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:08:22AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > This list is definitely too all-encompassing, and we should
> > move at least some of the BSDs into "not-deprecated".
> > I'm posting the patch for the moment
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:52:01AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 March 2017 at 11:49, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:08:22AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> We plan to drop support in a future QEMU release for host OSes
> >> and host
On 17 March 2017 at 11:49, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:08:22AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> We plan to drop support in a future QEMU release for host OSes
>> and host architectures for which we have no test machine where
>> we can build and run
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:08:22AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> We plan to drop support in a future QEMU release for host OSes
> and host architectures for which we have no test machine where
> we can build and run tests. For the 2.9 release, make configure
> print a warning if it is run on such
We plan to drop support in a future QEMU release for host OSes
and host architectures for which we have no test machine where
we can build and run tests. For the 2.9 release, make configure
print a warning if it is run on such a host, so that the user
has some warning of the plans and can
On 10/03/2017 11:14, Lin Ma wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Lin Ma
> ---
> configure | 12
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index 6c21975..2603e10 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -1335,6 +1335,12 @@ Advanced
Signed-off-by: Lin Ma
---
configure | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 6c21975..2603e10 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -1335,6 +1335,12 @@ Advanced options (experts only):
--with-vss-sdk=SDK-path enable
Allow enabling seccomp support on s390x if sufficient build
dependencies are provided.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt
---
configure | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 86f5214..5056ba9 100755
--- a/configure
+++
On 5 January 2017 at 01:27, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 12:56:52AM +1000, Nathan Rossi wrote:
>> If libgcrypt info is available with pkg-config use it over using the
>> libgcrypt-config. pkg-config is preferred due to is compatibility with
>>
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 12:56:52AM +1000, Nathan Rossi wrote:
> If libgcrypt info is available with pkg-config use it over using the
> libgcrypt-config. pkg-config is preferred due to is compatibility with
> cross-compilation (where you cannot execute the targets version of
> libgcrypt-config).
If libgcrypt info is available with pkg-config use it over using the
libgcrypt-config. pkg-config is preferred due to is compatibility with
cross-compilation (where you cannot execute the targets version of
libgcrypt-config).
This change makes configure check for libgcrypt in pkg-config first,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:52:17AM -0500, Francis Deslauriers wrote:
> The detection program needs to be linked with -ldl to build succesfully
> with recent versions of LTTng-UST.
>
> We also need to add -ldl to the libs required to build the LTTng-UST
> backend (lttng_ust_libs).
>
>
The detection program needs to be linked with -ldl to build succesfully
with recent versions of LTTng-UST.
We also need to add -ldl to the libs required to build the LTTng-UST
backend (lttng_ust_libs).
Signed-off-by: Francis Deslauriers
---
configure | 4 ++--
On 12 September 2016 at 18:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 12/09/2016 15:10, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> QEMU's code relies on left shifts of signed integers always
>> being defined behaviour with the obvious 2s-complement
>> semantics. The only way to tell the compiler (and
301 - 400 of 1161 matches
Mail list logo