On 1/17/19 12:07 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 17:14, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>
>> On Linux (and maybe some BSDs), we require libutil for the openpty()
>> function. However, this library is not available on some other systems, so
>> we currently use a fragile if-statement in the
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 17:14, Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> On Linux (and maybe some BSDs), we require libutil for the openpty()
> function. However, this library is not available on some other systems, so
> we currently use a fragile if-statement in the configure script to check
> whether we need the
On 17/01/19 18:14, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On Linux (and maybe some BSDs), we require libutil for the openpty()
> function. However, this library is not available on some other systems, so
> we currently use a fragile if-statement in the configure script to check
> whether we need the library or not.
On 1/17/19 11:14 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On Linux (and maybe some BSDs), we require libutil for the openpty()
> function. However, this library is not available on some other systems, so
> we currently use a fragile if-statement in the configure script to check
> whether we need the library or
On 1/17/19 6:14 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On Linux (and maybe some BSDs), we require libutil for the openpty()
> function. However, this library is not available on some other systems, so
> we currently use a fragile if-statement in the configure script to check
> whether we need the library or
On Linux (and maybe some BSDs), we require libutil for the openpty()
function. However, this library is not available on some other systems, so
we currently use a fragile if-statement in the configure script to check
whether we need the library or not. Unfortunately, we also hard-coded a
"-lutil"
