On 13 July 2017 at 15:21, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Solaris 9 was released in 2002, its successor Solaris 10 was
> released in 2005, and Solaris 9 was end-of-lifed in 2014.
> Nobody has stepped forward to express interest in supporting
> Solaris of any flavour, so removing
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 03:21:37PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Solaris 9 was released in 2002, its successor Solaris 10 was
> released in 2005, and Solaris 9 was end-of-lifed in 2014.
> Nobody has stepped forward to express interest in supporting
> Solaris of any flavour, so removing support for
On 07/13/2017 09:21 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Solaris 9 was released in 2002, its successor Solaris 10 was
> released in 2005, and Solaris 9 was end-of-lifed in 2014.
> Nobody has stepped forward to express interest in supporting
> Solaris of any flavour, so removing support for the ancient
>
Solaris 9 was released in 2002, its successor Solaris 10 was
released in 2005, and Solaris 9 was end-of-lifed in 2014.
Nobody has stepped forward to express interest in supporting
Solaris of any flavour, so removing support for the ancient
versions seems uncontroversial.
In particular, this