Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: Fix build for some versions of glibc (9pfs)

2012-06-12 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Stefan Weil wrote: > > Some versions declare open_by_handle_at, but don't define AT_EMPTY_PATH. > > Extend the check in configure to test both preconditions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil > > I have just noticed that this i

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: Fix build for some versions of glibc (9pfs)

2012-06-08 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Stefan Weil wrote: > Some versions declare open_by_handle_at, but don't define AT_EMPTY_PATH. > Extend the check in configure to test both preconditions. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil I have just noticed that this issue also affects QEMU 1.0.x, but we don't have a check for

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: Fix build for some versions of glibc (9pfs)

2012-06-07 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Stefano Stabellini (stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com): > On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Stefan Weil wrote: > > Some versions declare open_by_handle_at, but don't define AT_EMPTY_PATH. > > Extend the check in configure to test both preconditions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil > > It works for m

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: Fix build for some versions of glibc (9pfs)

2012-06-07 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Stefan Weil wrote: > Some versions declare open_by_handle_at, but don't define AT_EMPTY_PATH. > Extend the check in configure to test both preconditions. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil It works for me. Also I think it is a better fix than the original patch. Acked-by: Stefan

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: Fix build for some versions of glibc (9pfs)

2012-06-06 Thread Stefan Weil
Some versions declare open_by_handle_at, but don't define AT_EMPTY_PATH. Extend the check in configure to test both preconditions. Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil --- configure |4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/configure b/configure index 799ad0f..f737f6c 100755 --- a/configu