On 2019-01-14 16:23, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 2019-01-14 16:02, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 1/14/19 8:53 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
[...]
>>> The patch is only changing libiscsi_cflags, so it's not affecting the
>>> entire project, but just the files that use libiscsi.
>>
>> Even so, limiting the damage to
On 2019-01-14 16:02, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 1/14/19 8:53 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 2019-01-14 15:50, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> On 1/14/19 8:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>>
>
> Can we suppress the warnings with #pragma instead ?
> That would avoid compiling the .o file with
On 1/14/19 3:36 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 2019-01-14 15:31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 1/14/19 2:46 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> The header "scsi-lowlevel.h" of libiscsi 1.9.0 contains some bad
>>> "inline" prototype definitions which GCC refuses to compile in its
>>> gnu99 mode:
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 03:53:48PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 2019-01-14 15:50, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 1/14/19 8:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> Can we suppress the warnings with #pragma instead ?
> >>> That would avoid compiling the .o file with different
> >>> C
On 1/14/19 8:53 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 2019-01-14 15:50, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 1/14/19 8:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>
Can we suppress the warnings with #pragma instead ?
That would avoid compiling the .o file with different
C semantics.
>>>
>>> IIUC this is a
On 1/14/19 8:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>
>> Can we suppress the warnings with #pragma instead ?
>> That would avoid compiling the .o file with different
>> C semantics.
>
> IIUC this is a built-in warning you can't disable, except by changing
> the compilation mode to have gnu89 inline
On 1/14/19 2:46 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The header "scsi-lowlevel.h" of libiscsi 1.9.0 contains some bad
> "inline" prototype definitions which GCC refuses to compile in its
> gnu99 mode:
>
> In file included from block/iscsi.c:52:0:
> /usr/include/iscsi/scsi-lowlevel.h:810:13: error: inline
On 2019-01-14 15:50, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 1/14/19 8:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Can we suppress the warnings with #pragma instead ?
>>> That would avoid compiling the .o file with different
>>> C semantics.
>>
>> IIUC this is a built-in warning you can't disable, except by
On 2019-01-14 15:31, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 01:52:01PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 13:47, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>
>>> The header "scsi-lowlevel.h" of libiscsi 1.9.0 contains some bad
>>> "inline" prototype definitions which GCC refuses to
On 2019-01-14 15:31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 1/14/19 2:46 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> The header "scsi-lowlevel.h" of libiscsi 1.9.0 contains some bad
>> "inline" prototype definitions which GCC refuses to compile in its
>> gnu99 mode:
>>
>> In file included from block/iscsi.c:52:0:
>>
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 01:52:01PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 13:47, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >
> > The header "scsi-lowlevel.h" of libiscsi 1.9.0 contains some bad
> > "inline" prototype definitions which GCC refuses to compile in its
> > gnu99 mode:
> >
> > In file
The header "scsi-lowlevel.h" of libiscsi 1.9.0 contains some bad
"inline" prototype definitions which GCC refuses to compile in its
gnu99 mode:
In file included from block/iscsi.c:52:0:
/usr/include/iscsi/scsi-lowlevel.h:810:13: error: inline function
‘scsi_set_uint16’ declared but never defined
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 13:47, Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> The header "scsi-lowlevel.h" of libiscsi 1.9.0 contains some bad
> "inline" prototype definitions which GCC refuses to compile in its
> gnu99 mode:
>
> In file included from block/iscsi.c:52:0:
> /usr/include/iscsi/scsi-lowlevel.h:810:13:
13 matches
Mail list logo
