Thanks, applied.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
gcc will silently accept unrecognized -Wno-wombat warning suppression
options (it only mentions them if it has to print a compiler warning
for some other reason). Since we already run a check for
On 10/28/2012 1:19 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
gcc will silently accept unrecognized -Wno-wombat warning suppression
options (it only mentions them if it has to print a compiler warning
for some other reason). Since we already run a check for whether gcc
recognizes the warning options we use, we
gcc will silently accept unrecognized -Wno-wombat warning suppression
options (it only mentions them if it has to print a compiler warning
for some other reason). Since we already run a check for whether gcc
recognizes the warning options we use, we can easily make this use
the positive sense of
Am 27.10.2012 23:19, schrieb Peter Maydell:
gcc will silently accept unrecognized -Wno-wombat warning suppression
options (it only mentions them if it has to print a compiler warning
for some other reason). Since we already run a check for whether gcc
recognizes the warning options we use, we
