cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(), despite the name, can also be used to
write images into RAM - and will often be used that way if the machine
uses load_image_targphys() into RAM addresses.
However, cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(), unlike
cpu_physical_memory_rw() doesn't invalidate any cached TBs
On 22.08.2012, at 07:57, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:55:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.08.2012, at 06:59, David Gibson wrote:
cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(), despite the name, can also be used to
write images into RAM - and will often be used that way if the
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 08:02:11AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.08.2012, at 07:57, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:55:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.08.2012, at 06:59, David Gibson wrote:
cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(), despite the name, can also be
On 22.08.2012, at 08:10, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 08:02:11AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.08.2012, at 07:57, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:55:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.08.2012, at 06:59, David Gibson wrote:
On 22.08.2012, at 08:10, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 08:02:11AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.08.2012, at 07:57, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:55:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.08.2012, at 06:59, David Gibson wrote:
On 2012-08-22 07:57, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:55:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.08.2012, at 06:59, David Gibson wrote:
cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(), despite the name, can also be used to
write images into RAM - and will often be used that way if the machine
On 2012-08-22 08:47, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-22 07:57, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:55:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.08.2012, at 06:59, David Gibson wrote:
cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(), despite the name, can also be used to
write images into RAM - and
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 09:05:52AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-22 08:47, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-22 07:57, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:55:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.08.2012, at 06:59, David Gibson wrote:
cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(),
On 22.08.2012, at 13:38, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 09:05:52AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-22 08:47, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-08-22 07:57, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:55:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.08.2012, at 06:59, David Gibson
On 08/22/2012 02:47 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Ok, so IIUC, that means we do need the cpu_physical_memory_write_rom()
version for load_image_targphys(), and so my original patch is
basically the right fix.
Sure it is, I don't think anyone argued about that :). But it's duplicating
code in
cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(), despite the name, can also be used to
write images into RAM - and will often be used that way if the machine
uses load_image_targphys() into RAM addresses.
However, cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(), unlike cpu_physical_memory_rw()
does invalidate any cached TBs
On 22.08.2012, at 06:59, David Gibson wrote:
cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(), despite the name, can also be used to
write images into RAM - and will often be used that way if the machine
uses load_image_targphys() into RAM addresses.
However, cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(), unlike
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:55:31AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 22.08.2012, at 06:59, David Gibson wrote:
cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(), despite the name, can also be used to
write images into RAM - and will often be used that way if the machine
uses load_image_targphys() into RAM
13 matches
Mail list logo
