Hello,
On Friday 19 October 2012 11:59:24 Philipp Hahn wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 September 2011 22:06:25 dann frazier wrote:
...
> > -/* TODO: we have no capabilities, so why is this bit set? */
> > -pci_set_word(pci_conf + PCI_STATUS, PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST);
...
> Since cmask[PCI_STATUS=6] =
Hello,
On Wednesday 21 September 2011 22:06:25 dann frazier wrote:
> The Capabilities Pointer is NULL, so this bit shouldn't be set. The state
> of this bit doesn't appear to change any behavior on Linux/Windows versions
> we've tested, but it does cause Windows' PCI/PCI Express Compliance Test to
On 09/21/2011 03:06 PM, dann frazier wrote:
[Originally sent to qemu-kvm list, but I was redirected here]
The Capabilities Pointer is NULL, so this bit shouldn't be set. The state of
this bit doesn't appear to change any behavior on Linux/Windows versions we've
tested, but it does cause Windows'
[Originally sent to qemu-kvm list, but I was redirected here]
The Capabilities Pointer is NULL, so this bit shouldn't be set. The state of
this bit doesn't appear to change any behavior on Linux/Windows versions we've
tested, but it does cause Windows' PCI/PCI Express Compliance Test to balk.
I h
