Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000: Never increment the RX undersize count register

2019-04-14 Thread Jason Wang
On 2019/4/15 上午11:29, Jason Wang wrote: On 2019/4/5 下午6:31, Stefano Garzarella wrote: On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 10:21:26AM -0500, Mark Kanda wrote: From: Chris Kenna In situations where e1000 receives an undersized Ethernet frame, QEMU increments the emulated "Receive Undersize Count (RUC)"

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000: Never increment the RX undersize count register

2019-04-14 Thread Jason Wang
On 2019/4/5 下午6:31, Stefano Garzarella wrote: On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 10:21:26AM -0500, Mark Kanda wrote: From: Chris Kenna In situations where e1000 receives an undersized Ethernet frame, QEMU increments the emulated "Receive Undersize Count (RUC)" register when padding the frame. This is

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000: Never increment the RX undersize count register

2019-04-05 Thread Stefano Garzarella
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 10:21:26AM -0500, Mark Kanda wrote: > From: Chris Kenna > > In situations where e1000 receives an undersized Ethernet frame, > QEMU increments the emulated "Receive Undersize Count (RUC)" > register when padding the frame. > > This is incorrect because this an expected sc

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000: Never increment the RX undersize count register

2019-04-04 Thread Mark Kanda
From: Chris Kenna In situations where e1000 receives an undersized Ethernet frame, QEMU increments the emulated "Receive Undersize Count (RUC)" register when padding the frame. This is incorrect because this an expected scenario (e.g. with VLAN tag stripping) and not an error. As such, QEMU shou