On 25.11.2018 18:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/11/18 00:50, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> On 22.11.2018 08:24, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>> On 16.11.2018 13:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 14/11/18 14:04, Alexandro Sanchez Bach wrote:
> Intel HAXM supports now 32-bit and 64-bit Linux hosts. Thi
On 1/8/19 7:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/01/19 18:12, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> On 25.11.2018 18:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 25/11/18 00:50, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 22.11.2018 08:24, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 16.11.2018 13:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 14/11/18 14:04
On 08/01/19 18:12, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 25.11.2018 18:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 25/11/18 00:50, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>> On 22.11.2018 08:24, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 16.11.2018 13:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 14/11/18 14:04, Alexandro Sanchez Bach wrote:
>> Intel HA
On 25.11.2018 18:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/11/18 00:50, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> On 22.11.2018 08:24, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>> On 16.11.2018 13:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 14/11/18 14:04, Alexandro Sanchez Bach wrote:
> Intel HAXM supports now 32-bit and 64-bit Linux hosts. Thi
On 25/11/18 00:50, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 22.11.2018 08:24, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> On 16.11.2018 13:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 14/11/18 14:04, Alexandro Sanchez Bach wrote:
Intel HAXM supports now 32-bit and 64-bit Linux hosts. This patch includes
the corresponding userland
On 22.11.2018 08:24, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 16.11.2018 13:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 14/11/18 14:04, Alexandro Sanchez Bach wrote:
>>> Intel HAXM supports now 32-bit and 64-bit Linux hosts. This patch includes
>>> the corresponding userland changes.
>>>
>>> Since the Darwin userland backe
On 16.11.2018 13:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 14/11/18 14:04, Alexandro Sanchez Bach wrote:
>> Intel HAXM supports now 32-bit and 64-bit Linux hosts. This patch includes
>> the corresponding userland changes.
>>
>> Since the Darwin userland backend is POSIX-compliant, the hax-darwin.{c,h}
>> files
Hey Paolo,
> What's the advantage of HAXM when Linux hosts can just run KVM?
For end-users, it's true that there's several disadvantages and barely any
advantages: There's some guests run only on HAXM, since it can handle MMIO
accesses using BMI instructions ...and that's about it. :-) The HAXM A
On 14/11/18 14:04, Alexandro Sanchez Bach wrote:
> Intel HAXM supports now 32-bit and 64-bit Linux hosts. This patch includes
> the corresponding userland changes.
>
> Since the Darwin userland backend is POSIX-compliant, the hax-darwin.{c,h}
> files have been renamed to hax-posix.{c,h}. This pref
Intel HAXM supports now 32-bit and 64-bit Linux hosts. This patch includes
the corresponding userland changes.
Since the Darwin userland backend is POSIX-compliant, the hax-darwin.{c,h}
files have been renamed to hax-posix.{c,h}. This prefix is consistent with
the naming used in the rest of QEMU.
Alexandro Sanchez Bach writes:
> Intel HAXM supports now 32-bit and 64-bit Linux hosts. This patch includes
> the corresponding userland changes.
>
> Since the Darwin userland backend is POSIX-compliant, the hax-darwin.{c,h}
> files have been renamed to hax-posix.{c,h}. This prefix is consisten
Intel HAXM supports now 32-bit and 64-bit Linux hosts. This patch includes
the corresponding userland changes.
Since the Darwin userland backend is POSIX-compliant, the hax-darwin.{c,h}
files have been renamed to hax-posix.{c,h}. This prefix is consistent with
the naming used in the rest of QEMU.
Signed-off-by: Alexandro Sanchez Bach
---
target/i386/Makefile.objs | 5 -
target/i386/hax-i386.h| 10 +-
target/i386/{hax-darwin.c => hax-posix.c} | 0
target/i386/{hax-darwin.h => hax-posix.h} | 0
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions
13 matches
Mail list logo
