Thank you for applying my patch.
> I had to resolve conflicts with the tracing patches and chose to keep
> the trace points from pci_irq_pulse() for pci_irq_assert(), but didn't
> add them to pci_irq_deassert(). Please check if this makes sense to you.
It makes sense for now.
I will send another
Am 18.12.2017 um 06:00 hat Hikaru Nishida geschrieben:
> Pin-based interrupt of NVMe controller did not work properly
> because using an obsolated function pci_irq_pulse().
> To fix this, change to use pci_irq_assert() / pci_irq_deassert()
> instead of pci_irq_pulse().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hikaru Ni
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 02:00:43PM +0900, Hikaru Nishida wrote:
> Pin-based interrupt of NVMe controller did not work properly
> because using an obsolated function pci_irq_pulse().
> To fix this, change to use pci_irq_assert() / pci_irq_deassert()
> instead of pci_irq_pulse().
Looks good. Thanks
ping...
2017-12-22 16:31 GMT+09:00 Hikaru Nishida :
> ping
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/849786/
>
> 2017-12-18 14:00 GMT+09:00 Hikaru Nishida :
>> Pin-based interrupt of NVMe controller did not work properly
>> because using an obsolated function pci_irq_pulse().
>> To fix this, change to u
ping
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/849786/
2017-12-18 14:00 GMT+09:00 Hikaru Nishida :
> Pin-based interrupt of NVMe controller did not work properly
> because using an obsolated function pci_irq_pulse().
> To fix this, change to use pci_irq_assert() / pci_irq_deassert()
> instead of pci_irq_p
Pin-based interrupt of NVMe controller did not work properly
because using an obsolated function pci_irq_pulse().
To fix this, change to use pci_irq_assert() / pci_irq_deassert()
instead of pci_irq_pulse().
Signed-off-by: Hikaru Nishida
---
hw/block/nvme.c | 39 ++
