On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 03:34:46PM +0200, Matthias Lange wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 03:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 02:42:05PM +0200, Matthias Lange wrote:
> >> On 10/22/2015 01:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:38:11PM +0200, Matthias Lan
On 10/22/2015 03:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 02:42:05PM +0200, Matthias Lange wrote:
>> On 10/22/2015 01:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:38:11PM +0200, Matthias Lange wrote:
Processor nodes created via the acpi/aml framework curren
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 02:42:05PM +0200, Matthias Lange wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 01:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:38:11PM +0200, Matthias Lange wrote:
> >> Processor nodes created via the acpi/aml framework currently don't
> >> feature a _HID string. This patch appe
Processor nodes created via the acpi/aml framework currently don't
feature a _HID string. This patch appends "ACPI0007" as the _HID
string to each processor node.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Lange
---
hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/
On 10/22/2015 01:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:38:11PM +0200, Matthias Lange wrote:
>> Processor nodes created via the acpi/aml framework currently don't
>> feature a _HID string. This patch appends "ACPI0007" as the _HID
>> string to each processor node.
>>
>> Signe
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:38:11PM +0200, Matthias Lange wrote:
> Processor nodes created via the acpi/aml framework currently don't
> feature a _HID string. This patch appends "ACPI0007" as the _HID
> string to each processor node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Lange
Indeed, it does that. But w
