On 07/14/2015 04:30 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 13/07/2015 21:41, John Snow wrote:
>> s->ports should never exceed 32, but coverity doesn't know that.
>> ncq_tfs->sector_count should also never exceed 64K.
Personally I tend to mark that kind of thing as a false
posi
On 13/07/2015 21:41, John Snow wrote:
>>> >> s->ports should never exceed 32, but coverity doesn't know that.
>>> >> ncq_tfs->sector_count should also never exceed 64K.
>> >
>> > Personally I tend to mark that kind of thing as a false
>> > positive in the coverity UI and move on...
>> >
>> > --
On 07/13/2015 03:40 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 July 2015 at 20:26, John Snow wrote:
>> Just a handful of casts to quiet coverity up.
>>
>> s->ports should never exceed 32, but coverity doesn't know that.
>> ncq_tfs->sector_count should also never exceed 64K.
>
> Personally I tend to mark
On 13 July 2015 at 20:26, John Snow wrote:
> Just a handful of casts to quiet coverity up.
>
> s->ports should never exceed 32, but coverity doesn't know that.
> ncq_tfs->sector_count should also never exceed 64K.
Personally I tend to mark that kind of thing as a false
positive in the coverity UI
Just a handful of casts to quiet coverity up.
s->ports should never exceed 32, but coverity doesn't know that.
ncq_tfs->sector_count should also never exceed 64K.
Why not make Coverity a happy camper, though.
Signed-off-by: John Snow
---
hw/ide/ahci.c | 8
hw/ide/macio.c | 2 +-
2 fi
