On 03/29/2016 07:25 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>
> Le 29/03/2016 16:01, cheng...@emindsoft.com.cn a écrit :
>> From: Chen Gang
>>
>> The restorer needs the return code address which is frame->retcode, not
>> frame itself.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
>> ---
>> linux-user/signal.c | 2 +-
>>
On 3/29/16 22:25, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 29/03/2016 16:01, cheng...@emindsoft.com.cn a écrit :
>> The restorer needs the return code address which is frame->retcode, not
>> frame itself.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
>> ---
>> linux-user/signal.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
Le 29/03/2016 16:01, cheng...@emindsoft.com.cn a écrit :
> From: Chen Gang
>
> The restorer needs the return code address which is frame->retcode, not
> frame itself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
> ---
> linux-user/signal.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --
From: Chen Gang
The restorer needs the return code address which is frame->retcode, not
frame itself.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
---
linux-user/signal.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/signal.c b/linux-user/signal.c
index e487f9e..4157154 100644
---