On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 02:21:42PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 5 June 2014 14:11, Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 03:07:59PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
Ping!
Looks good, I'll collect this and other linux-user patches and submit
linux-user
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 03:07:59PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
Ping!
Looks good, I'll collect this and other linux-user patches and submit
linux-user update
by tomorrow.
Riku
thanks
-- PMM
On 10 May 2014 12:25, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
We were returning the
On 5 June 2014 14:11, Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 03:07:59PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
Ping!
Looks good, I'll collect this and other linux-user patches and submit
linux-user update
by tomorrow.
Does that include the set you did fixing gcc 4.9
Ping!
thanks
-- PMM
On 10 May 2014 12:25, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
We were returning the incorrect uname string (with a hyphen, not
an underscore) for x86_64. Fix this by removing the x86_64 special
case, since the default just use UNAME_MACHINE behaviour suffices.
This
We were returning the incorrect uname string (with a hyphen, not
an underscore) for x86_64. Fix this by removing the x86_64 special
case, since the default just use UNAME_MACHINE behaviour suffices.
This leaves cpu_to_uname_machine() special cases for only those
architectures which need to vary
