Le 09/02/2016 16:57, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> Our implementation of shmat() and shmdt() for linux-user was
> using "zero guest address" as its marker for "entry in the
> shm_regions[] array is not in use". This meant that if the
> guest did a shmdt(0) we would match on an unused array entry
> an
On 10 February 2016 at 18:39, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>
> Le 09/02/2016 16:57, Peter Maydell a écrit :
>> Our implementation of shmat() and shmdt() for linux-user was
>> using "zero guest address" as its marker for "entry in the
>> shm_regions[] array is not in use". This meant that if the
>> gues
Le 09/02/2016 16:57, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> Our implementation of shmat() and shmdt() for linux-user was
> using "zero guest address" as its marker for "entry in the
> shm_regions[] array is not in use". This meant that if the
> guest did a shmdt(0) we would match on an unused array entry
Is
Our implementation of shmat() and shmdt() for linux-user was
using "zero guest address" as its marker for "entry in the
shm_regions[] array is not in use". This meant that if the
guest did a shmdt(0) we would match on an unused array entry
and call page_set_flags() with both start and end addresses
