On 21.04.2013 16:21, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 18.04.2013 16:35, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Peter Lieven
wrote:
On 15.04.2013 15:08, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Peter Crosthwaite writes
On 21.04.2013 16:21, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 18.04.2013 16:35, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Peter Lieven
wrote:
On 15.04.2013 15:08, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Peter Crosthwaite writes:
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 18.04.2013 16:35, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Peter Lieven
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15.04.2013 15:08, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Peter Crosthwaite writes:
> Modify
On 18.04.2013 16:35, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
On 15.04.2013 15:08, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Peter Crosthwaite writes:
Modify Anthony's starvation detection logic to keep the BQL unlocked
until the starvation condition goes away.
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> On 15.04.2013 15:08, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>> Peter Crosthwaite writes:
>>
>>> Modify Anthony's starvation detection logic to keep the BQL unlocked
>>> until the starvation condition goes away. Otherwise the counter has to
>>>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Peter Crosthwaite writes:
>
>> Modify Anthony's starvation detection logic to keep the BQL unlocked
>> until the starvation condition goes away. Otherwise the counter has to
>> count up to 1000 for each needed iteration until the busy-wai
On 15.04.2013 15:08, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Peter Crosthwaite writes:
Modify Anthony's starvation detection logic to keep the BQL unlocked
until the starvation condition goes away. Otherwise the counter has to
count up to 1000 for each needed iteration until the busy-wait is
lifted.
Reset the
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 15/04/2013 15:08, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>>> > Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite
>> I'm going through patches for 1.5 candidates.
>>
>> I believe the paste performance issue has been resolved now and this
>> patch is no longer needed. I can't find a definitive st
Il 15/04/2013 15:08, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>> > Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite
> I'm going through patches for 1.5 candidates.
>
> I believe the paste performance issue has been resolved now and this
> patch is no longer needed. I can't find a definitive statement on the
> list for that
Peter Crosthwaite writes:
> Modify Anthony's starvation detection logic to keep the BQL unlocked
> until the starvation condition goes away. Otherwise the counter has to
> count up to 1000 for each needed iteration until the busy-wait is
> lifted.
>
> Reset the counter back to zero once glib_poll
Modify Anthony's starvation detection logic to keep the BQL unlocked
until the starvation condition goes away. Otherwise the counter has to
count up to 1000 for each needed iteration until the busy-wait is
lifted.
Reset the counter back to zero once glib_pollfds_fill returns with a
non-zero timout
11 matches
Mail list logo