On 10/02/2016 23:40, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 10 February 2016 at 14:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> The last two arguments to these functions are the last and first bit to
>> check relative to the base. The code was using incorrectly the first
>> bit and the number of bits.
On 10 February 2016 at 22:40, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 10 February 2016 at 14:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> The last two arguments to these functions are the last and first bit to
>> check relative to the base. The code was using incorrectly the
The last two arguments to these functions are the last and first bit to
check relative to the base. The code was using incorrectly the first
bit and the number of bits. Fix this in cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty
and cpu_physical_memory_all_dirty. This requires a few changes in the
iteration;
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The last two arguments to these functions are the last and first bit to
> check relative to the base. The code was using incorrectly the first
> bit and the number of bits. Fix this in cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty
> and
On 10.02.2016 15:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The last two arguments to these functions are the last and first bit to
> check relative to the base. The code was using incorrectly the first
> bit and the number of bits. Fix this in cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty
> and cpu_physical_memory_all_dirty.
On 10/02/16 14:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The last two arguments to these functions are the last and first bit to
> check relative to the base. The code was using incorrectly the first
> bit and the number of bits. Fix this in cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty
> and cpu_physical_memory_all_dirty.
On 10 February 2016 at 14:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The last two arguments to these functions are the last and first bit to
> check relative to the base. The code was using incorrectly the first
> bit and the number of bits. Fix this in cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty
> and