On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 05:39:36PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi Hani,
>
> Am 27.04.2014 12:29, schrieb Hani Benhabiles:
> > Signed-off-by: Hani Benhabiles
> > ---
> >
> > Not sure whether the qobject stringifying functions could fit or be of some
> > use
> > elsewhere. Thus, I kept them as
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 05/05/2014 20:33, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
> >>+data = object_property_get_qobject(obj, info->name, NULL);
> >>+if (!data) {
> >>+list = list->next;
> >>+continue;
>
> You
Hi Hani,
Am 27.04.2014 12:29, schrieb Hani Benhabiles:
> Signed-off-by: Hani Benhabiles
> ---
>
> Not sure whether the qobject stringifying functions could fit or be of some
> use
> elsewhere. Thus, I kept them as static near the only place where they are used
> at the moment.
Your "info qom-t
Il 05/05/2014 20:33, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
+data = object_property_get_qobject(obj, info->name, NULL);
+if (!data) {
+list = list->next;
+continue;
You could use object_property_print and get rid of a relatively large
amount of code
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 11:29:30 +0100
Hani Benhabiles wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Hani Benhabiles
Who can review this one? I'm not familiar enough with QOM to do it.
> ---
>
> Not sure whether the qobject stringifying functions could fit or be of some
> use
> elsewhere. Thus, I kept them as static
Signed-off-by: Hani Benhabiles
---
Not sure whether the qobject stringifying functions could fit or be of some use
elsewhere. Thus, I kept them as static near the only place where they are used
at the moment.
hmp-commands.hx | 2 +
hmp.c | 143 +++
