On 04/07/2016 07:44 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Until commit 1c778ef7 ("nbd: convert to using I/O channels for actual
socket I/O", 2016-02-16), nbd_wr_sync returned -EAGAIN this scenario.
nbd_reply_ready required these semantics because it has two conflicting
requirements:
1) if a reply can be rece
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 01:44:55PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Until commit 1c778ef7 ("nbd: convert to using I/O channels for actual
> socket I/O", 2016-02-16), nbd_wr_sync returned -EAGAIN this scenario.
> nbd_reply_ready required these semantics because it has two conflicting
> requirements:
>
Until commit 1c778ef7 ("nbd: convert to using I/O channels for actual
socket I/O", 2016-02-16), nbd_wr_sync returned -EAGAIN this scenario.
nbd_reply_ready required these semantics because it has two conflicting
requirements:
1) if a reply can be received on the socket, nbd_reply_ready needs
to re