QEMU can emulate hubs to connect NICs and netdevs. This is currently
primarily used for the mis-named 'vlan' feature of the networking
subsystem. Now the 'vlan' feature has been marked as deprecated, since
its name is rather confusing and the users often rather mis-configure
their network when tryi
On 10/01/2018 15:32, Thomas Huth wrote:
> QEMU can emulate hubs to connect NICs and netdevs. This is currently
> primarily used for the mis-named 'vlan' feature of the networking
> subsystem. Now the 'vlan' feature has been marked as deprecated, since
> its name is rather confusing and the users of
On 10.01.2018 15:47, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/01/2018 15:32, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> QEMU can emulate hubs to connect NICs and netdevs. This is currently
>> primarily used for the mis-named 'vlan' feature of the networking
>> subsystem. Now the 'vlan' feature has been marked as deprecated, since
On 2018年01月10日 22:32, Thomas Huth wrote:
QEMU can emulate hubs to connect NICs and netdevs. This is currently
primarily used for the mis-named 'vlan' feature of the networking
subsystem. Now the 'vlan' feature has been marked as deprecated, since
its name is rather confusing and the users often
On 15.01.2018 08:40, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2018年01月10日 22:32, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> QEMU can emulate hubs to connect NICs and netdevs. This is currently
>> primarily used for the mis-named 'vlan' feature of the networking
>> subsystem. Now the 'vlan' feature has been marked as deprecated, since
On 15.01.2018 18:36, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 15.01.2018 08:40, Jason Wang wrote:
[...]
>> And since it was a hub, do we need to send to its netdev too inside
>> net_hub_receive()?
>
> I currently don't think so, but I'll check again...
OK, I now think we're definitely fine here. The check is real
On 2018年01月16日 02:06, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 15.01.2018 18:36, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 15.01.2018 08:40, Jason Wang wrote:
[...]
And since it was a hub, do we need to send to its netdev too inside
net_hub_receive()?
I currently don't think so, but I'll check again...
OK, I now think we're def