04.01.2018 20:39, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> Check for the presence of posix_memalign() in the configure script,
> not using "defined(_POSIX_C_SOURCE) && !defined(__sun__)". This
> lets qemu use posix_memalign() on NetBSD versions that have it,
> instead of falling back to valloc() which is waste
On 08.01.2018 17:01, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Can we put this through the -trivial tree? (cc'd)
>
> I'm not sufficiently familiar with the intenal workflows of the qemu
> project to give a meaningful answer to that question.
>
I don't maintain a NetBSD merge queue and
Peter Maydell wrote:
> Can we put this through the -trivial tree? (cc'd)
I'm not sufficiently familiar with the intenal workflows of the qemu
project to give a meaningful answer to that question.
--
Andreas Gustafsson, g...@gson.org
On 8 January 2018 at 16:01, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Can we put this through the -trivial tree? (cc'd)
>
> I'm not sufficiently familiar with the intenal workflows of the qemu
> project to give a meaningful answer to that question.
Sorry, I should have been clearer, tha
On 4 January 2018 at 17:39, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> Check for the presence of posix_memalign() in the configure script,
> not using "defined(_POSIX_C_SOURCE) && !defined(__sun__)". This
> lets qemu use posix_memalign() on NetBSD versions that have it,
> instead of falling back to valloc() whi
On 04.01.2018 18:39, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> Check for the presence of posix_memalign() in the configure script,
> not using "defined(_POSIX_C_SOURCE) && !defined(__sun__)". This
> lets qemu use posix_memalign() on NetBSD versions that have it,
> instead of falling back to valloc() which is wa
Check for the presence of posix_memalign() in the configure script,
not using "defined(_POSIX_C_SOURCE) && !defined(__sun__)". This
lets qemu use posix_memalign() on NetBSD versions that have it,
instead of falling back to valloc() which is wasteful when the
required alignment is smaller than a pa
