Am 31.10.2011 04:01, schrieb Zhi Yong Wu:
It is better to use qiov.size in qed-table.c to get nb_sectors than
iov.iov_len.
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
The commit message should probably say why it's better. Not saying
otherwise, but I can't see the different at the
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 31.10.2011 04:01, schrieb Zhi Yong Wu:
It is better to use qiov.size in qed-table.c to get nb_sectors than
iov.iov_len.
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
The commit message should probably say why it's
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Zhi Yong Wu zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 31.10.2011 04:01, schrieb Zhi Yong Wu:
It is better to use qiov.size in qed-table.c to get nb_sectors than
iov.iov_len.
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 02:11:00PM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
From: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com
To: Zhi Yong Wu zwu.ker...@gmail.com
Cc: Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com, Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Content-Type: text/plain;
It is better to use qiov.size in qed-table.c to get nb_sectors than iov.iov_len.
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
block/qed-table.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/qed-table.c b/block/qed-table.c
index f31f9ff..8ee8443
