On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 27 June 2011 14:34, Stefano Stabellini
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> You probably want to only call qemu_ram_ptr_length() if (todo).
> >> (I don't know if anybody ever calls this routine with a zero input
> >> length, but
On 27 June 2011 14:34, Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> You probably want to only call qemu_ram_ptr_length() if (todo).
>> (I don't know if anybody ever calls this routine with a zero input
>> length, but that would handle that case too.)
>
> I would rather
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 June 2011 12:08, wrote:
> > From: Stefano Stabellini
> >
> > qemu_ram_ptr_length should take ram_addr_t as argument rather than
> > target_phys_addr_t because is doing comparisons with RAMBlock addresses.
> >
> > cpu_physical_memory_map should cr
On 24 June 2011 12:08, wrote:
> From: Stefano Stabellini
>
> qemu_ram_ptr_length should take ram_addr_t as argument rather than
> target_phys_addr_t because is doing comparisons with RAMBlock addresses.
>
> cpu_physical_memory_map should create a ram_addr_t address to pass to
> qemu_ram_ptr_leng
From: Stefano Stabellini
qemu_ram_ptr_length should take ram_addr_t as argument rather than
target_phys_addr_t because is doing comparisons with RAMBlock addresses.
cpu_physical_memory_map should create a ram_addr_t address to pass to
qemu_ram_ptr_length from PhysPageDesc phys_offset.
Remove co
