On 11/06/2011 10:00 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
The caller of qemu_timedate_diff() does not expect that tm it passes to
the function will be modified, but mktime() is destructive and modifies
its argument. Pass a copy of tm to it and set tm_isdst so that mktime()
will not rely on it since its value m
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:16:29PM +0200, Ronen Hod wrote:
> On 11/06/2011 06:00 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >The caller of qemu_timedate_diff() does not expect that tm it passes to
> >the function will be modified, but mktime() is destructive and modifies
> >its argument. Pass a copy of tm to it and
On 11/06/2011 06:00 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
The caller of qemu_timedate_diff() does not expect that tm it passes to
the function will be modified, but mktime() is destructive and modifies
its argument. Pass a copy of tm to it and set tm_isdst so that mktime()
will not rely on it since its value m
On 11/06/2011 11:00 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
The caller of qemu_timedate_diff() does not expect that tm it passes to
the function will be modified, but mktime() is destructive and modifies
its argument. Pass a copy of tm to it and set tm_isdst so that mktime()
will not rely on it since its value m
The caller of qemu_timedate_diff() does not expect that tm it passes to
the function will be modified, but mktime() is destructive and modifies
its argument. Pass a copy of tm to it and set tm_isdst so that mktime()
will not rely on it since its value may be outdated.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov
