Quoting Markus Armbruster (2015-09-24 02:02:41)
> Ping?
Thanks, applied to qga tree:
https://github.com/mdroth/qemu/commits/qga
>
> Markus Armbruster writes:
>
> > g_new(T, n) is neater than g_malloc(sizeof(T) * n). It's also safer,
> > for two reasons. One, it catches multiplication over
Ping?
Markus Armbruster writes:
> g_new(T, n) is neater than g_malloc(sizeof(T) * n). It's also safer,
> for two reasons. One, it catches multiplication overflowing size_t.
> Two, it returns T * rather than void *, which lets the compiler catch
> more type errors.
>
> This commit only touches
On 09/14/2015 05:50 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> g_new(T, n) is neater than g_malloc(sizeof(T) * n). It's also safer,
> for two reasons. One, it catches multiplication overflowing size_t.
> Two, it returns T * rather than void *, which lets the compiler catch
> more type errors.
>
> This commi
g_new(T, n) is neater than g_malloc(sizeof(T) * n). It's also safer,
for two reasons. One, it catches multiplication overflowing size_t.
Two, it returns T * rather than void *, which lets the compiler catch
more type errors.
This commit only touches allocations with size arguments of the form
si
