On 02/24/2012 05:11 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/23/2012 10:21 AM, Alexander Barabash wrote:
On 02/22/2012 09:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/22/2012 12:00 PM, alexander_barab...@mentor.com wrote:
From: Alexander Barabashalexander_barab...@mentor.com
Why do you want to have a delete
On 02/23/2012 10:21 AM, Alexander Barabash wrote:
On 02/22/2012 09:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/22/2012 12:00 PM, alexander_barab...@mentor.com wrote:
From: Alexander Barabashalexander_barab...@mentor.com
In the existing implementation, object_delete()
calls object_unref(), then frees
On 02/22/2012 09:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/22/2012 12:00 PM, alexander_barab...@mentor.com wrote:
From: Alexander Barabashalexander_barab...@mentor.com
In the existing implementation, object_delete()
calls object_unref(), then frees the object's storage.
Running object_delete() on an
From: Alexander Barabash alexander_barab...@mentor.com
In the existing implementation, object_delete()
calls object_unref(), then frees the object's storage.
Running object_delete() on an object with reference count
different from 1 causes program failure.
In the existing implementation,
On 02/22/2012 12:00 PM, alexander_barab...@mentor.com wrote:
From: Alexander Barabashalexander_barab...@mentor.com
In the existing implementation, object_delete()
calls object_unref(), then frees the object's storage.
Running object_delete() on an object with reference count
different from 1