On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 11:55:51 +0530, Harsh Prateek Bora
ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Currently, we just print the numerical value of 9p operation identifier in
case of RERROR which is less meaningful for readability. Mapping 9p
operation ids to symbolic names provides a better tracelog:
On 11/09/2011 01:43 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 11:55:51 +0530, Harsh Prateek
Boraha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Currently, we just print the numerical value of 9p operation identifier in
case of RERROR which is less meaningful for readability. Mapping 9p
operation ids to
Currently, we just print the numerical value of 9p operation identifier in
case of RERROR which is less meaningful for readability. Mapping 9p
operation ids to symbolic names provides a better tracelog:
RERROR (tag = 1 , id = TWALK , err = 2 )
RERROR (tag = 1 , id = TUNLINKAT ,
