On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 18:49, John Snow wrote:
>
> Some versions of Clang prior to 6.0 (and some builds of clang after,
> such as 6.0.1-2.fc28) fail to recognize { 0 } as a valid initializer
> for a struct with subobjects when -Wmissing-braces is enabled.
>
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
On 11/27/18 2:02 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/27/18 12:49 PM, John Snow wrote:
>> Some versions of Clang prior to 6.0 (and some builds of clang after,
>> such as 6.0.1-2.fc28) fail to recognize { 0 } as a valid initializer
>> for a struct with subobjects when -Wmissing-braces is enabled.
>>
>>
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 19:02, Eric Blake wrote:
>
> On 11/27/18 12:49 PM, John Snow wrote:
> > Some versions of Clang prior to 6.0 (and some builds of clang after,
> > such as 6.0.1-2.fc28) fail to recognize { 0 } as a valid initializer
> > for a struct with subobjects when -Wmissing-braces is ena
On 11/27/18 12:49 PM, John Snow wrote:
Some versions of Clang prior to 6.0 (and some builds of clang after,
such as 6.0.1-2.fc28) fail to recognize { 0 } as a valid initializer
for a struct with subobjects when -Wmissing-braces is enabled.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21689 and
https://
Some versions of Clang prior to 6.0 (and some builds of clang after,
such as 6.0.1-2.fc28) fail to recognize { 0 } as a valid initializer
for a struct with subobjects when -Wmissing-braces is enabled.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21689 and
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL314499 suggests this s
