Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com
---
hw/display/qxl.c | 2 +-
ui/spice-display.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/display/qxl.c b/hw/display/qxl.c
index 736fd3c..d43aa49 100644
--- a/hw/display/qxl.c
+++ b/hw/display/qxl.c
@@ -710,7 +710,7
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 08:12:44 +0200
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com
Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com
---
hw/display/qxl.c | 2 +-
ui/spice-display.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
On 20 June 2014 14:35, Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 08:12:44 +0200
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com
Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com
Thanks; applied directly to master as a buildfix.
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:57:11 +0100
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 20 June 2014 14:35, Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 08:12:44 +0200
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com
Tested-by:
New 32bit warnings sneaked in, this time in
ui/spice-display.c, fix them.
This gets annonying, /me sets up a ubuntu buildbot
slave for 32bit spice testbuilds.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com
---
roms/seabios |2 +-
ui/spice-display.c | 12 ++--
2 files
On 20 March 2012 11:26, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
New 32bit warnings sneaked in, this time in
ui/spice-display.c, fix them.
This gets annonying, /me sets up a ubuntu buildbot
slave for 32bit spice testbuilds.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com
---
roms/seabios
Hi,
What's the roms/seabios change doing here?
Just a missing git submodule update and the diff from that sneaking in.
Also, isn't the ui/spice-display.c patch the same as this one from
me from a couple of weeks back?
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/145269/
It is. Picked that one up
On 20 March 2012 12:13, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
Also, isn't the ui/spice-display.c patch the same as this one from
me from a couple of weeks back?
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/145269/
It is. Picked that one up instead.
/me is confused, I through I had that one already
20.03.2012 15:26, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
New 32bit warnings sneaked in, this time in
ui/spice-display.c, fix them.
This gets annonying, /me sets up a ubuntu buildbot
slave for 32bit spice testbuilds.
Um, is it worth to watch/fix? Note that spice does
not work on 32bits anyway, qemu segfaults
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:45:26PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
20.03.2012 15:26, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
New 32bit warnings sneaked in, this time in
ui/spice-display.c, fix them.
This gets annonying, /me sets up a ubuntu buildbot
slave for 32bit spice testbuilds.
Um, is it worth to
On 20 March 2012 12:45, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
Um, is it worth to watch/fix? Note that spice does
not work on 32bits anyway, qemu segfaults at startup...
I've had conflicting answers about this -- the Spice FAQ says
it doesn't work on 32 bits but in this message:
11 matches
Mail list logo