On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 02:34, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> The previous simplification got the order of operands to the
> subtraction wrong. Since the 64-bit product is the subtrahend,
> we must use a 64-bit subtract to properly compute the borrow
> from the low-part of the product.
>
> Fixes: 5f
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 3:33 AM Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> The previous simplification got the order of operands to the
> subtraction wrong. Since the 64-bit product is the subtrahend,
> we must use a 64-bit subtract to properly compute the borrow
> from the low-part of the product.
>
> Fi
The previous simplification got the order of operands to the
subtraction wrong. Since the 64-bit product is the subtrahend,
we must use a 64-bit subtract to properly compute the borrow
from the low-part of the product.
Fixes: 5f8cd06ebcf5 ("target/arm: Simplify SMMLA, SMMLAR, SMMLS, SMMLSR")
Repo