On 25 November 2015 at 18:02, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> The AArch32 translation completion code for singlestep enabled/active
> case was a way more confusing and too repetitive then it needs to be.
> Probably that was the cause for a bug to be introduced into it at some
> point. The bug was that SWI
On 26.11.2015 15:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 25 November 2015 at 18:02, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> The AArch32 translation completion code for singlestep enabled/active
>> case was a way more confusing and too repetitive then it needs to be.
>> Probably that was the cause for a bug to be introduce
On 25 November 2015 at 18:02, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> The AArch32 translation completion code for singlestep enabled/active
> case was a way more confusing and too repetitive then it needs to be.
> Probably that was the cause for a bug to be introduced into it at some
> point. The bug was that SWI
The AArch32 translation completion code for singlestep enabled/active
case was a way more confusing and too repetitive then it needs to be.
Probably that was the cause for a bug to be introduced into it at some
point. The bug was that SWI/HVC/SMC exception would be generated in
condition-failed ins
