On 03.03.2016 16:49, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 March 2016 at 19:19, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> On 02.03.2016 21:04, Sergey Sorokin wrote:
>>> Qemu reports translation fault on 1st level instead of 0th level in case of
>>> AArch64 address translation if the translation table walk is disabled or
>>>
On 2 March 2016 at 19:19, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> On 02.03.2016 21:04, Sergey Sorokin wrote:
>> Qemu reports translation fault on 1st level instead of 0th level in case of
>> AArch64 address translation if the translation table walk is disabled or
>> the address is in the gap between the two regio
On 02.03.2016 21:04, Sergey Sorokin wrote:
Qemu reports translation fault on 1st level instead of 0th level in case of
AArch64 address translation if the translation table walk is disabled or
the address is in the gap between the two regions.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Sorokin
---
target-arm/helpe
On 02.03.2016 21:04, Sergey Sorokin wrote:
> Qemu reports translation fault on 1st level instead of 0th level in case of
> AArch64 address translation if the translation table walk is disabled or
> the address is in the gap between the two regions.
It's probably not a very clear description in the
Qemu reports translation fault on 1st level instead of 0th level in case of
AArch64 address translation if the translation table walk is disabled or
the address is in the gap between the two regions.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Sorokin
---
target-arm/helper.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
dif
