Jason, ping? Are you going to do a v3 of this patch?
Thanks
-- PMM
On 19 November 2011 16:20, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 November 2011 14:20, Jason Wessel wrote:
>> The maxsd instruction needs to take into account the sign of the
>> numbers 64 bit numbers. This is a regression that was introd
On 8 November 2011 14:20, Jason Wessel wrote:
> The maxsd instruction needs to take into account the sign of the
> numbers 64 bit numbers. This is a regression that was introduced in
> 347ac8e356 (target-i386: switch to softfloat).
>
> The case that fails is:
>
> maxsd %xmm1,%xmm0
>
> When xmm1
The maxsd instruction needs to take into account the sign of the
numbers 64 bit numbers. This is a regression that was introduced in
347ac8e356 (target-i386: switch to softfloat).
The case that fails is:
maxsd %xmm1,%xmm0
When xmm1 = 24 and xmm0 = -100
This was found running the glib2 binding
