[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-mips: Enable access to required RDHWR hardware registers

2012-08-20 Thread Meador Inge
While running in the usermode emulator all of the MIPS32r2 *required* RDHWR hardware registers should be accessible (the Linux kernel enables access to these same registers). Signed-off-by: Meador Inge --- target-mips/translate.c |7 +-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-mips: Enable access to required RDHWR hardware registers

2012-08-21 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 21.08.2012 01:41, schrieb Meador Inge: > While running in the usermode emulator all of the MIPS32r2 *required* > RDHWR hardware registers should be accessible (the Linux kernel enables > access to these same registers). > > Signed-off-by: Meador Inge > --- > target-mips/translate.c |7 +++

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-mips: Enable access to required RDHWR hardware registers

2012-08-21 Thread Meador Inge
On 08/21/2012 05:14 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 21.08.2012 01:41, schrieb Meador Inge: >> While running in the usermode emulator all of the MIPS32r2 *required* >> RDHWR hardware registers should be accessible (the Linux kernel enables >> access to these same registers). >> >> Signed-off-by: Mea

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-mips: Enable access to required RDHWR hardware registers

2012-08-21 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Le 21/08/2012 17:41, Meador Inge a écrit : > On 08/21/2012 05:14 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> Am 21.08.2012 01:41, schrieb Meador Inge: >>> While running in the usermode emulator all of the MIPS32r2 *required* >>> RDHWR hardware registers should be accessible (the Linux kernel enables >>> access

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-mips: Enable access to required RDHWR hardware registers

2012-08-21 Thread Meador Inge
On 08/21/2012 10:52 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Le 21/08/2012 17:41, Meador Inge a écrit : >> On 08/21/2012 05:14 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> So what about the non-MIPS32r2 case? IIUC then the SYNCI_Step register >>> would no longer be accessible, which your commit message does not >>> mention.