Hi,
I guess this should get into 2.0 ?
Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
We wanted to loop till index is 8. On 8 we return with H_PTEG_FULL. If we are
successful in loading hpte with any other index, we continue
Am 14.03.2014 14:51, schrieb Aneesh Kumar K.V:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
We wanted to loop till index is 8. On 8 we return with H_PTEG_FULL. If we are
successful in loading hpte with any other index, we continue with that
index value.
Reported-by: Paolo
Il 14/03/2014 14:51, Aneesh Kumar K.V ha scritto:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
We wanted to loop till index is 8. On 8 we return with H_PTEG_FULL. If we are
successful in loading hpte with any other index, we continue with that
index value.
Reported-by: Paolo Bonzini
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
We wanted to loop till index is 8. On 8 we return with H_PTEG_FULL. If we are
successful in loading hpte with any other index, we continue with that
index value.
Reported-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V