On 29.01.15 01:48, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 07:51:58PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> We look at two sizes specified in ISA (4K, 64K). If not found matching,
>> we consider it 16MB.
>>
>> Without this patch we would fail to lookup address above 16MB range.
>> Below 16MB ha
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 07:51:58PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> We look at two sizes specified in ISA (4K, 64K). If not found matching,
> we consider it 16MB.
>
> Without this patch we would fail to lookup address above 16MB range.
> Below 16MB happened to work before because the kernel have a
We look at two sizes specified in ISA (4K, 64K). If not found matching,
we consider it 16MB.
Without this patch we would fail to lookup address above 16MB range.
Below 16MB happened to work before because the kernel have a liner
mapping and we always looked up hash for 0xc000. The
actu