On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 09:00:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> From: Thomas Monjalon
>
> This line was a bit clear.
> The next lines set or reset this bit (LE) depending of another bit (ILE).
> So the first line is useless.
Thanks, applied.
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
> ---
> target-
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>> Thomas, have you verified that it still boots a ppc64 guest?
>>
>
> No, but I don't see any specific link between ppc64 and this change.
>
> This is the current (pseudo)code:
> LE = 0
> if ILE == 1
> LE = 1
> else
>
Alexander Graf wrote:
> Thomas, have you verified that it still boots a ppc64 guest?
No, but I don't see any specific link between ppc64 and this change.
This is the current (pseudo)code:
LE = 0
if ILE == 1
LE = 1
else
LE = 0
In all cases, LE will be overwritten after
On 29.05.2010, at 15:31, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 28.05.2010 um 21:00 schrieb Thomas Monjalon:
>
>> From: Thomas Monjalon
>>
>> This line was a bit clear.
>> The next lines set or reset this bit (LE) depending of another bit (ILE).
>> So the first line is useless.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thoma
Am 28.05.2010 um 21:00 schrieb Thomas Monjalon:
From: Thomas Monjalon
This line was a bit clear.
The next lines set or reset this bit (LE) depending of another bit
(ILE).
So the first line is useless.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
---
target-ppc/helper.c |1 -
1 files changed, 0 inser
From: Thomas Monjalon
This line was a bit clear.
The next lines set or reset this bit (LE) depending of another bit (ILE).
So the first line is useless.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
---
target-ppc/helper.c |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-ppc/he
