Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: Mask the SIGP order_code to 8bit.

2017-04-25 Thread Alexander Graf
On 04/25/2017 01:21 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: On 2017-04-25 11:51, Richard Henderson wrote: On 04/24/2017 10:25 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 24.04.17 00:32, Aurelien Jarno wrote: From: Philipp Kern According to "CPU Signaling and Response", "Signal-Processor Orders", the order field is bit pos

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: Mask the SIGP order_code to 8bit.

2017-04-25 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2017-04-25 11:51, Richard Henderson wrote: On 04/24/2017 10:25 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 24.04.17 00:32, Aurelien Jarno wrote: From: Philipp Kern According to "CPU Signaling and Response", "Signal-Processor Orders", the order field is bit position 56-63. Without this, the Linux guest ke

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: Mask the SIGP order_code to 8bit.

2017-04-25 Thread Richard Henderson
On 04/24/2017 10:25 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 24.04.17 00:32, Aurelien Jarno wrote: From: Philipp Kern According to "CPU Signaling and Response", "Signal-Processor Orders", the order field is bit position 56-63. Without this, the Linux guest kernel is sometimes unable to stop emulation an

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: Mask the SIGP order_code to 8bit.

2017-04-24 Thread Alexander Graf
On 24.04.17 00:32, Aurelien Jarno wrote: From: Philipp Kern According to "CPU Signaling and Response", "Signal-Processor Orders", the order field is bit position 56-63. Without this, the Linux guest kernel is sometimes unable to stop emulation and enters an infinite loop of "XXX unknown sigp:

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: Mask the SIGP order_code to 8bit.

2017-04-23 Thread Aurelien Jarno
From: Philipp Kern According to "CPU Signaling and Response", "Signal-Processor Orders", the order field is bit position 56-63. Without this, the Linux guest kernel is sometimes unable to stop emulation and enters an infinite loop of "XXX unknown sigp: 0x0005". Signed-off-by: Philipp

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: Mask the SIGP order_code to 8bit.

2016-05-29 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:18:42AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 20.08.15 19:16, Thomas Huth wrote: > > On 18/08/15 04:50, Philipp Kern wrote: > >> According to "CPU Signaling and Response", "Signal-Processor Orders", > >> the order field is bit position 56-63. Without this, the Linux > >>

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: Mask the SIGP order_code to 8bit.

2015-08-26 Thread Alexander Graf
On 20.08.15 19:16, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 18/08/15 04:50, Philipp Kern wrote: >> According to "CPU Signaling and Response", "Signal-Processor Orders", >> the order field is bit position 56-63. Without this, the Linux >> guest kernel is sometimes unable to stop emulation and enters >> an infinite

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: Mask the SIGP order_code to 8bit.

2015-08-20 Thread Thomas Huth
On 18/08/15 04:50, Philipp Kern wrote: > According to "CPU Signaling and Response", "Signal-Processor Orders", > the order field is bit position 56-63. Without this, the Linux > guest kernel is sometimes unable to stop emulation and enters > an infinite loop of "XXX unknown sigp: 0x0005

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-s390x: Mask the SIGP order_code to 8bit.

2015-08-18 Thread Philipp Kern
According to "CPU Signaling and Response", "Signal-Processor Orders", the order field is bit position 56-63. Without this, the Linux guest kernel is sometimes unable to stop emulation and enters an infinite loop of "XXX unknown sigp: 0x0005". Signed-off-by: Philipp Kern --- target-s3