On 18/11/2016 13:53, Greg Kurz wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
Hi Greg,
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 21:22:33 +0100
> Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>> On 16/11/2016 15:17, Greg Kurz wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:17:47 +0100
>>> Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>
On 16.11.2016 13:37, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed,
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 21:22:33 +0100
Laurent Vivier wrote:
> On 16/11/2016 15:17, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:17:47 +0100
> > Thomas Huth wrote:
> >
> >> On 16.11.2016 13:37, Greg Kurz wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:24:50 +
> >>> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
On 16/11/2016 15:17, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:17:47 +0100
> Thomas Huth wrote:
>
>> On 16.11.2016 13:37, Greg Kurz wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:24:50 +
>>> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote:
>>>
* Greg Kurz (gr...@kaod.org) wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:3
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:17:47PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 16.11.2016 13:37, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:24:50 +
> > "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote:
> >
> >> * Greg Kurz (gr...@kaod.org) wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:39:31 +0100
> >>> Thomas Huth wrote:
> >>>
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:39:31 +0100
Thomas Huth wrote:
> The ppc64 postcopy test does not work with KVM-PR, and it is also
> causing annoying warning messages when run on a x86 host. So let's
> use KVM here only if we know that we're running with KVM-HV (which
> automatically also means that we're
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:17:47 +0100
Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 16.11.2016 13:37, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:24:50 +
> > "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote:
> >
> >> * Greg Kurz (gr...@kaod.org) wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:39:31 +0100
> >>> Thomas Huth wrote:
> >>>
On 16.11.2016 13:37, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:24:50 +
> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote:
>
>> * Greg Kurz (gr...@kaod.org) wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:39:31 +0100
>>> Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>
The ppc64 postcopy test does not work with KVM-PR, and it is also
c
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:24:50 +
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote:
> * Greg Kurz (gr...@kaod.org) wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:39:31 +0100
> > Thomas Huth wrote:
> >
> > > The ppc64 postcopy test does not work with KVM-PR, and it is also
> > > causing annoying warning messages when run o
* Greg Kurz (gr...@kaod.org) wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:39:31 +0100
> Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> > The ppc64 postcopy test does not work with KVM-PR, and it is also
> > causing annoying warning messages when run on a x86 host. So let's
> > use KVM here only if we know that we're running with KVM
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:39:31 +0100
Thomas Huth wrote:
> The ppc64 postcopy test does not work with KVM-PR, and it is also
> causing annoying warning messages when run on a x86 host. So let's
> use KVM here only if we know that we're running with KVM-HV (which
> automatically also means that we're
On 16/11/2016 09:39, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The ppc64 postcopy test does not work with KVM-PR, and it is also
> causing annoying warning messages when run on a x86 host. So let's
> use KVM here only if we know that we're running with KVM-HV (which
> automatically also means that we're running on a
On 16.11.2016 10:19, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>
> On 16/11/2016 09:39, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> The ppc64 postcopy test does not work with KVM-PR, and it is also
>> causing annoying warning messages when run on a x86 host. So let's
>> use KVM here only if we know that we're running with KVM-HV (which
On 16/11/2016 09:39, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The ppc64 postcopy test does not work with KVM-PR, and it is also
> causing annoying warning messages when run on a x86 host. So let's
> use KVM here only if we know that we're running with KVM-HV (which
> automatically also means that we're running on a
The ppc64 postcopy test does not work with KVM-PR, and it is also
causing annoying warning messages when run on a x86 host. So let's
use KVM here only if we know that we're running with KVM-HV (which
automatically also means that we're running on a ppc64 host), and
fall back to TCG otherwise.
Sign
14 matches
Mail list logo