On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 08:39:14AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Di, 2014-08-05 at 16:05 +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Ping?
Back online. What is the state here? I've seen Stefan (Cc'ed) posted a
different patch for the same issue? Anything merged meanwhile?
I am sending a v2 of my
On Di, 2014-08-05 at 16:05 +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Ping?
Back online. What is the state here? I've seen Stefan (Cc'ed) posted a
different patch for the same issue? Anything merged meanwhile?
cheers,
Gerd
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com writes:
Gerd Hoffmann
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com writes:
On Di, 2014-08-05 at 16:05 +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Ping?
Back online. What is the state here? I've seen Stefan (Cc'ed) posted a
different patch for the same issue? Anything merged meanwhile?
Neither patch has been merged. Either would do
Ping?
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com writes:
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com writes:
This way the tests run without sound hardware being present
on the build machine. Even with sound hardware it IMO isn't
very useful to use it in regression testing. Once the sound
card tests are
This way the tests run without sound hardware being present
on the build machine. Even with sound hardware it IMO isn't
very useful to use it in regression testing. Once the sound
card tests are advanced enougth that they try to actually
play sound we probably want the guests sound output
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com writes:
This way the tests run without sound hardware being present
on the build machine. Even with sound hardware it IMO isn't
very useful to use it in regression testing. Once the sound
card tests are advanced enougth that they try to actually
play sound